• Zuki [he/him, comrade/them]
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 years ago

    I could drive 20 Hummers, and I still wouldn't be having the same impact on the environment as having one kid does.

    • 420clownpeen [they/them,any]
      ·
      4 years ago

      You could have 20 kids and I'm not sure if they'd actually put more carbon into the atmosphere than a single fighter jet does across its lifecycle. ;)

      Though the math gets trickier if one or more of them ends up contributing to the manufacture of said aircraft.

      • Zuki [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Alright, at this point it's only you that's going to see this, so I'll give my response to the whole everything. Yes, antinatalism takes a defeatist approach to a lot of these issues. But, genuinely, do you see these issues being solved within your lifetime? Do you think the proletariat will rise up and seize the means of production, violently uniting to throw off the shackles of the bourgeoisie? I can definitely tell you my opinion, that they will not. We are on an on-fire planet, jokingly saying "this is fine" to quell our own fears. Most likely outcome is that the rich will all escape via space, leaving the poor behind to die on this burning shithole of a planet. So, yes, while the military-industrial complex does contribute more to the end of humanity than having one kid does, unless you are somehow certain that your kid will be some combination of Che Guevara and Albert Einstein, I'm saying it's wrong to bring them into this world.