Don't you know that any potential leader is probably just a grifter? If you want to build an effective leftist movement, you have to have no leaders whatsoever. Directionless resentment is surely the only way forward.

  • chapoid [none/use name]
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 years ago

    You're talking out of both sides of your mouth . I love how when talking about Occupy you say "They had no leadership everything came down to council meetings to make shared proclamations, and then everyone gave up and just drank and did drugs until the cops sweeped them out one night." But then in the next breath you're endorsing the "flat hierarchy" lfmao, of soviet worker councils and their delegates. "Flat heirarchy" is about as oxymoronic as "capitalist democracy." Delegates arent leaders, they're messengers. Nor are "specialists." You are talking nonsense.

    There's a reason antifa doesnt have a leader, but you probably think that's dumb.

    • anthropicprincipal [any]
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      Some hierarchies are flatter than others. Delegates from soviet councils had wide executive powers to obtain goods, services, and general labor. They weren't just messengers. They were more like project managers who worked for the workers obtaining, managing, and divvying up the grants from the national council.

      Ancoms, Iron Front, and probably even libs all claim antifa. The whole idea is to be leaderless for operational security. It is not dumb, it is smart. Outside of street fights though hierarchies are needed. You can't have people choosing a different person they want to try to engineer a bridge every other day, that is anarchy.

      • chapoid [none/use name]
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 years ago

        Delegates from soviet councils had wide executive powers to obtain goods, services, and general labor. They weren’t just messengers.

        "In a system with temporary and instantly revocable delegates, workers decide on what their agenda is and what their needs are. They also mandate a temporary delegate to divulge and pursue them. The temporary delegates are elected among the workers themselves, can be instantly revoked if they betray their mandate, and are supposed to change frequently. The delegates act as messengers, carrying and interchanging the intention of the groups of workers."

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workers%27_council

        hierarchies are needed. You can’t have people choosing a different person they want to try to engineer a bridge every other day, that is anarchy.

        holy fuck what a shit take. Hierarchy is not specialization. The engineers do not have rule over the steelworkers who weld the bridge. Anarchy is not doing whatever you want jesus fucking christ.

        • OhWell [he/him]
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          We don't even have a working class movement in the US but you're going to compare it to Soviet councils? LOL.

          Movements do need hierarchy and leaders and the left has none of that in the US. Compare it to the far right. They have a central figure they rally around (Trump), who do we have? No one. Maybe it was Sanders, but the left is so divided and infights over the most stupid petty bullshit, that he wasn't good enough before dropping out and shilling for Biden.

          And Occupy was a shitshow and I would know cause I was involved and following it from day 1. Occupy was proof that the bourgeoise are not intimidated or threatened by peaceful protests. It led to nothing and went out with a whimper.

          • chapoid [none/use name]
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 years ago

            Movements do need hierarchy and leaders and the left has none of that in the US

            Because they're all dead or in jail you fucking genius

          • chapoid [none/use name]
            ·
            4 years ago

            Occupy was proof that the bourgeoise are not intimidated or threatened by peaceful protests. It led to nothing and went out with a whimper.

            Riiiiight, which is why they had a massive police presence from day one, were under constant harassment by cops, and went out with a violent raid nationally coordinated by the FBI. Fuck off.

            https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/dec/29/fbi-coordinated-crackdown-occupy

        • anthropicprincipal [any]
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          That is why I said soviet. We are talking about two different things.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_(council)

          Engineers do have rule over who can work on a bridge. Name a bridge that was built without a foreman. I never said anarchy was doing whatever you want. Direct democracy can't apply everywhere and at all times. There have to be leaders.

          • Nagarjuna [he/him]
            ·
            4 years ago

            Name a bridge that was built without a foreman

            Most foremen are in a temporary position that's assigned by the union. Even under capitalism foreman is a temporary position of power with a very specific purview.

          • chapoid [none/use name]
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 years ago

            I'm sorry you didnt say anarchy is doing whatever you want, you said anarchy is picking a new person to try to build a bridge every other day. Wow the anarchy understander has arrived my apologies.