Look. I'm not trying to start another pointless struggle session. Far from that, I want each and every one of us to confront this most strange attempt at multilateralism by two of our favourite existing socialisms.

There's no substantial article on the environment. Not a single word on climate or pollution. And nothing on labour issues.

I get that the whole thing is brand new and the member countries will probably amend to add more to the document in later stages.

But now is the point the heads of governments go back to their respective legislative body for ratification. Again, nothing on labour, the environment or the climate.

I want us Chapos to confront the likelihood that existing socialist experiments are faltering, even abandoning, a key promise of socialism to workers: reducing work hours for more leisure time. That, and no idea how trade is going to connect to the climate crisis.

  • Awoo [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    What is the customary international law minimum standard of treatment of aliens? I feel like understanding that is essential to parsing this.

    • skeletorsass [she/her]
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      Montevideo convention is being referenced:

      nationals and foreigners are under the same protection of the law and the national authorities, and foreigners may not claim rights other than or more extensive than those of nationals

        • Civility [none/use name]
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          Found this on Expropriation, doesn't seem awful:

          Article 10.13: Expropriation

          251.No Party shall expropriate or nationalise a covered investment either directly or through measures equivalent to expropriation or This Article shall be interpreted in accordance with Annex 10B (Expropriation).10-16 nationalisation (hereinafter referred to as “expropriation” in this Chapter), except:

          (a)for a public purpose;

          (b)in a non-discriminatory manner;

          (c )on payment of compensation in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3; and

          (d)in accordance with due process of law.

        • skeletorsass [she/her]
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          Yes, exactly this. Extremely common in trade agreements and well established customary law.