Please note, this is a proposal, not a passed resolution. And I have no idea how many members it would take to submit a resolution, so it could be two weirdos or have huge internal chapter support.
Edit: It appears I have started a struggle session. I apologise.
For the record, my own view on this is that it is well intentioned, but extremely poorly designed and (likely) to be poorly implemented as well. In one of my comments below, I say "I don’t think DSA, a predominantly white and PMC organization, is at all equipped to handle this in a way that doesn’t create more problems. To me, it would make more sense to have a Black socialist org be given the $ to do as they see fit, if this is a path the chapter votes on. It screams of white guilt rather than building power, and individual charity rather than mutual aid.". AFROSOC is an internal DSA org, as I understand it.
And I feel this is a textbook example of "charity vs mutual aid", with this decidedly being charity.
How can the DSA have so many Based chapters, yet still having the same amount of cringe chapters?
that's what lack of democratic centralism and communism does to a motherfucker.
I've seen centralism result in having a cringe national org but when they stay out of a local orgs doings that local org is very effective. The point is, it goes both ways, but centralism is still better.
With centralism there's a danger of the entire org being cringe.
And without it too.
Removed by mod