I would recommend reading this and sending this to any radlibs/DSA/anarchists you know

  • thefunkycomitatus [he/him,they/them]
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 years ago

    Okay so you're saying that because you don't see unions in the west striking regularly, occupying workplace, forming picket lines, and assaulting scabs, then they're not militant enough. And a lack of militant unions is a sign of how weak western marxism is?

    Why don't they do these things? Why don't they strike regularly? Why don't they occupy private property? Why don't they assault scabs? Do you think it's just fear?

    • weshallovercum [any]
      hexagon
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      My opinion- fear, lack of class conciousness, present unions being kinda shitty with their collaborationism, lack of organisation,

        • weshallovercum [any]
          hexagon
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          but it fails to realize the reason why it’s true is because people just don’t have (enough) of a material reason to revolt right now.

          Please rid yourself of this notion completely from your mind. You are trying to divert blame from the Left for its lack of effective work put into organization, spreading propaganda, unionization etc, and instead just handwaving it using the excuse of material conditions. The left is far stronger in countries like Finland or Denmark, with their strong unionization and worker solidarity, inspite of having great material conditions. While the Left is destroyed and weak in countries like America or UK, where the material conditions are really bad for the workers, and have been for decades.

          You are also preoccupied with revolution and martyrdom, when the focus instead should be on rational activities like acquiring political power, achieving real gains etc.