asaharyev [he/him] to Main • 4 years agoIf you use "red fash" unironically...message-squaremessage-square110 fedilinkarrow-up1147file-text
arrow-up1131message-squareIf you use "red fash" unironically...asaharyev [he/him] to Main • 4 years agomessage-square110 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarelate90smullbowl [they/them]hexbear10arrow-down1·4 years agoReally well written post. What's the standard reply to this? link
minus-squaregarbage [none/use name,he/him]hexbear10arrow-down4·edit-24 years agothe standard reply on chapo seems to be " "sectarianism" * deleted" link
minus-squareDivineChaos100 [none/use name]hexbear7arrow-down4·4 years ago*random thread *completely uncalled for bashing of anarchists "Why are my comments deleted for sectarianism?" link
minus-squareKetamine_device_tech [none/use name]hexbear5arrow-down3·edit-24 years ago What’s the standard reply to this? Same one for all Marxists who are suspiciously without a materialist critique: "what are the conditions of their mode of production like?" link
minus-squarelate90smullbowl [they/them]hexbear10arrow-down1·edit-24 years ago"The conditions are as authoritarian as necessary to maintain the security of the state against a vicious imperial hegemonic order." link
Really well written post.
What's the standard reply to this?
the standard reply on chapo seems to be " "sectarianism" * deleted"
*random thread *completely uncalled for bashing of anarchists
"Why are my comments deleted for sectarianism?"
Same one for all Marxists who are suspiciously without a materialist critique: "what are the conditions of their mode of production like?"
"The conditions are as authoritarian as necessary to maintain the security of the state against a vicious imperial hegemonic order."