• DivineChaos100 [none/use name]
    ·
    4 years ago

    The anprim zine in the 90's that had a column glorifying mass casualty events because "nature is healing"

          • DivineChaos100 [none/use name]
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 years ago

            How the fuck do you type that fast.

            On a lot of issues they are, but i think in some aspects it's viable to me.

            • anonymous_ascendent [none/use name]
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              4 years ago

              In the most fundamental aspect they are reactionary. Socialism and leftism more broadly are about the furthering development of mankind, the social progress of development.

              Primitive Communism -> Tribalism -> Agricultural Society -> Feudalism -> Capitalism -> Socialism -> Communism

              If you reject this advancement and want to regress backwards to primitive communism, that is, by definition, reactionary and backwards. Let alone all of the implications of this (mass genocide, 99% of the population dying, trans and disabled people dying or being severely disadvantaged, collapse of all development and movements towards a non-predatory society)

              I would say anprims are anti-human or deeply dumb, and are more reactionary than fascists and monarchists even.

              • DivineChaos100 [none/use name]
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                edit-2
                4 years ago

                Whatever, i'm not here to argue.

                Edit: You guys can downvote me but if your assumption reading the comment i started off the thread this and the ones after that is that i support genocide i don't really know what to say.