Dude, what gets me is they rail on tankies for saying ML is scientific, arguing that science adapts itself and changes based on its failures and ML is dogmatic and doesn't do that, but when you argue that all countries that have had an ML revolution and are still around, Vietnam, Cuba, Loas, China, etc (if I'm missing any), have adapted and changed themselves with market reforms to avoid the failure of the USSR, they just say shit like "oh, so you're actually a capitalist" or if they really wanna get to me lol "oh, so your only accomplishment is a mild social democracy".
Dude, what gets me is they rail on tankies for saying ML is scientific, arguing that science adapts itself and changes based on its failures and ML is dogmatic and doesn’t do that,
That just makes everyone on both sides of the issue wrong in their understanding of science.
Dude, what gets me is they rail on tankies for saying ML is scientific, arguing that science adapts itself and changes based on its failures and ML is dogmatic and doesn't do that, but when you argue that all countries that have had an ML revolution and are still around, Vietnam, Cuba, Loas, China, etc (if I'm missing any), have adapted and changed themselves with market reforms to avoid the failure of the USSR, they just say shit like "oh, so you're actually a capitalist" or if they really wanna get to me lol "oh, so your only accomplishment is a mild social democracy".
deleted by creator
USSR also had a market reform and that one seems to be fairly unpopular around this parts.
That just makes everyone on both sides of the issue wrong in their understanding of science.