What is the significance of a young woman wearing cat ears? I have been pondering this question, and I think it’s an important to ponder, you know, we can’t simply accept these things at face value. But there’s a seeming contradiction that makes me think I’m not operating within the correct metaphysical substrate to answer this question. Obviously a human cannot have cat ears, so it’s on one hand unnatural. But the women depicted seem to act as normal on the other. The cat ears are a looming specter over their lives, an unmentioned peculiarity that is intrinsically tied to that. I cannot for the life of me determine what is intended here, but it seems profound
let’s say, for the sake of argument, that humans have cat ears. hypothetically, in this scenario, the cat ears don't change the biological species of the human. The facts here speak louder than your feelings. Humans with cat ears are still humans, hypothetically speaking. So here's a quick overview of the facts. The biological features of a homo sapiens do not include cat ears. I think we can have a rational political conversation about balancing catgirls and humans, however we must not forget the American constitution.
Ben! Good to hear from you. You hadn’t returns my calls about our Covid debate brunches, so I was worried you’d changed your number.
I don’t disagree. I worry about the Cultural Marxists on this website pushing for acknowledgement of a biological reality of cat ears which is simply not the case. I fear I will be gulag’d over my refusal to be coerced into the nekonatomy agenda
What is the significance of a young woman wearing cat ears? I have been pondering this question, and I think it’s an important to ponder, you know, we can’t simply accept these things at face value. But there’s a seeming contradiction that makes me think I’m not operating within the correct metaphysical substrate to answer this question. Obviously a human cannot have cat ears, so it’s on one hand unnatural. But the women depicted seem to act as normal on the other. The cat ears are a looming specter over their lives, an unmentioned peculiarity that is intrinsically tied to that. I cannot for the life of me determine what is intended here, but it seems profound
Mr Peterson,
let’s say, for the sake of argument, that humans have cat ears. hypothetically, in this scenario, the cat ears don't change the biological species of the human. The facts here speak louder than your feelings. Humans with cat ears are still humans, hypothetically speaking. So here's a quick overview of the facts. The biological features of a homo sapiens do not include cat ears. I think we can have a rational political conversation about balancing catgirls and humans, however we must not forget the American constitution.
Ben! Good to hear from you. You hadn’t returns my calls about our Covid debate brunches, so I was worried you’d changed your number.
I don’t disagree. I worry about the Cultural Marxists on this website pushing for acknowledgement of a biological reality of cat ears which is simply not the case. I fear I will be gulag’d over my refusal to be coerced into the nekonatomy agenda