• DonCheadleInTheWH [any]
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    4 years ago

    HOLY SHIT WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU GUYS??

    The article indicates that the Italian gov't tried to save face by censoring information about how they handled the pandemic, and you turn it into an allegation that Covid-19 originated there?!

    Useless propagandists. I'm done defending this website.

    • richietozier4 [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      its saying that Italy was doing the thing (covering up cases) that China was doing

        • CyborgMarx [any, any]
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 years ago

          With the current data its origins is mysterious at this point, but it definitely isn't wuhan, which means it could originate from any number of countries

          Just get over it dude, China was only the first to identify it and the one with the best response, sorry if that breaks your brain

        • TankieTanuki [he/him]
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          China very much still deliberately did this

          Deliberately created a pandemic? What?

      • DonCheadleInTheWH [any]
        arrow-down
        40
        ·
        4 years ago

        They're not defending China, they're treating consensus reality as fungible.

        #STOPTHESTEAL

          • Civility [none/use name]
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 years ago

            According to this news article a study by the National Cancer Institute of Italy, for one.

            The coronavirus was circulating in Italy since September 2019, a study by the National Cancer Institute, INT, of the Italian city of Milan shows.

            The World Health Organization has said COVID-19, the respiratory disease it causes, were unknown before the outbreak was first reported in Wuhan, in central China, in December.

            Italy’s first COVID-19 patient was detected on 21 February in a little town near Milan, in the northern region of Lombardy.

            But the Italian researchers’ findings, published by the INT’s scientific magazine Tumori Journal, show that 11.6 per cent of 959 healthy volunteers enrolled in a lung cancer screening trial between September 2019 and March 2020, had developed coronavirus antibodies well before February.

            Edit: here's the Journal article they published

            Abstract

            There are no robust data on the real onset of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and spread in the prepandemic period worldwide. We investigated the presence of SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD)–specific antibodies in blood samples of 959 asymptomatic individuals enrolled in a prospective lung cancer screening trial between September 2019 and March 2020 to track the date of onset, frequency, and temporal and geographic variations across the Italian regions. SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific antibodies were detected in 111 of 959 (11.6%) individuals, starting from September 2019 (14%), with a cluster of positive cases (>30%) in the second week of February 2020 and the highest number (53.2%) in Lombardy. This study shows an unexpected very early circulation of SARS-CoV-2 among asymptomatic individuals in Italy several months before the first patient was identified, and clarifies the onset and spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Finding SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in asymptomatic people before the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy may reshape the history of pandemic.

    • Civility [none/use name]
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Covid 19 did originate in Italy, or at the very least, had infected a lot of Italy well before the Wuhan outbreak was noticed.

      From an SBS news article on the subject:

      The coronavirus was circulating in Italy since September 2019, a study by the National Cancer Institute, INT, of the Italian city of Milan shows.

      The World Health Organization has said COVID-19, the respiratory disease it causes, were unknown before the outbreak was first reported in Wuhan, in central China, in December.

      Italy’s first COVID-19 patient was detected on 21 February in a little town near Milan, in the northern region of Lombardy.

      But the Italian researchers’ findings, published by the INT’s scientific magazine Tumori Journal, show that 11.6 per cent of 959 healthy volunteers enrolled in a lung cancer screening trial between September 2019 and March 2020, had developed coronavirus antibodies well before February.

      And here's the study they're talking about

      Abstract

      There are no robust data on the real onset of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and spread in the prepandemic period worldwide. We investigated the presence of SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD)–specific antibodies in blood samples of 959 asymptomatic individuals enrolled in a prospective lung cancer screening trial between September 2019 and March 2020 to track the date of onset, frequency, and temporal and geographic variations across the Italian regions. SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific antibodies were detected in 111 of 959 (11.6%) individuals, starting from September 2019 (14%), with a cluster of positive cases (>30%) in the second week of February 2020 and the highest number (53.2%) in Lombardy. This study shows an unexpected very early circulation of SARS-CoV-2 among asymptomatic individuals in Italy several months before the first patient was identified, and clarifies the onset and spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Finding SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in asymptomatic people before the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy may reshape the history of pandemic.

      • Pezevenk [he/him]
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 years ago

        Yyyeah that research is kinda questionable for a few reasons, primarily that somehow all of the people they found antibodies in were asymptomatic during that period EVEN THOUGH they were 55+ years old AND smokers. This sounds incredibly unlikely, almost as incredibly unlikely as the insanely high number reported. Like, yeah, it's not a representative group and all, but 11% BEFORE it was even detected? Yeah, no. Even if we don't consider that group representative, I don't see any serious reason why the prevalence among that group should be that much higher. I'm pretty sure they fucked something up because it makes 0 sense. For context, up to December the CDC estimates around 15% of the US had contracted COVID in total. Again, that's up to this December. It is a HUGE number, with vast consequences, and we're supposed to accept that a percentage about 2/3rds of that had infected Italy before the disease was even detected? There should be follow up studies because this one is just weird and suspicious.

    • OhWell [he/him]
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      4 years ago

      They have kneejerk reactions to anything criticizing China and go out of their way to defend even great examples of capitalism in work over there, so this is not surprising. I spend more time on r/collapse these days.