That's honestly a contradiction I've never thought of but it's spot on.
And really, circumcison is effectively irreversible. A lot of trans teens really just want puberty blockers, which is reversible (and now banned in the uk).
I don't know much about phalloplasty but vaginoplasty is largely unaffected. You get better results with an uncircumcised penis though because there's more skin to work with and more nerve endings.
Mutilating genitals is good but trans people asking for surgery is bad.
"How can a teenager possibly consent to permanently altering their body?" *Does elective surgery on a literal baby*
That's honestly a contradiction I've never thought of but it's spot on.
And really, circumcison is effectively irreversible. A lot of trans teens really just want puberty blockers, which is reversible (and now banned in the uk).
Doesn't mutilating genitals of either sex make GAS harder for trans people?
I don't know much about phalloplasty but vaginoplasty is largely unaffected. You get better results with an uncircumcised penis though because there's more skin to work with and more nerve endings.