With the membership approaching 100k, and with the structure of the organization being democratic and up for revision given a strong enough push from the internal caucuses, why are there still unaffiliated american socialists?
 I think the predominate view on this website is that DSA is a monolithic organization that is simply full of radlibs and social democrats or democratic socialists, however the richness of the caucuses and the amount of local marxist caucuses which are attempting to reform the DSA is in my opinion largely ignored here.
 The Democratic Socialists of America is *our* organization as socialists of america and if you critique it without affiliating yourself and without acting to change it, than what are you truly doing? It is definitely one of the twelve types of liberalism for you criticize in private but not to the collective itself. Problems you have with the DSA from your critical perspective should be brought up every month at your local general meeting. Critique from outside the organization, as if you were not a socialist, is not going to affect change. 

tl;dr: as a chapo who didn’t join DSA for years bc of the stigma here calling them radlibs, i ask of you, why are you seriously not in the DSA. for if you don’t like it, then join and act in the oppositional caucuses; and if you do like it but just haven’t joined, then come on comrade follow suit.

edit: This struggle session has been quite bountiful I will say. We have learned that there are three instances in the DSA's constitution that allow for (1) the expulsion of members that are under the discipline of democratic-centralist organizations (2) local charters will be revoked if the majority of members become under the discipline of democratic-centralism and that (3) local youth charters will be revoked if majority of members become. dem-cent.

  • D61 [any]
    cake
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    I have what amounts to about a 15 hour workday, 7 days a week.

    I live an hour away from any of the nearest large cities.

    Financially, don't have much extra cash to afford extra trips into the cities and all that would cost.

    So, I resign myself to sitting on the sidelines cheering folks on that are doing things.

    • PaulWall [he/him]
      hexagon
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      Can’t argue with that obviously; however there’s always being able to vote on national programs and whatnot which doesn’t require anything but an internet connection. Might be something to consider!

      • D61 [any]
        cake
        ·
        4 years ago

        hmm.. I suppose I could look into that.

        "No activism like slackdivism," am'i'right?

        • PaulWall [he/him]
          hexagon
          ·
          4 years ago

          Plus being a non-active member affords infinitely better seats on the sideline than being unaffiliated in general. 😉 you’ll see all the juicy action

          • D61 [any]
            cake
            ·
            4 years ago

            Action or drama?

            I'm not much of a drama-lama myself.