On one hand chapos are very horny on main and very sex positive despite not having it, but on the other hand the volcel police send horny chapos off to horny jail and porn is exploitive.
On one hand chapos are very horny on main and very sex positive despite not having it, but on the other hand the volcel police send horny chapos off to horny jail and porn is exploitive.
I mean that paying someone for porn isn't unethical if making porn is less sucky for them than other forms of employment.
The line between a pornstar and a prostitute is very thin. how many of them would do it if they made no money?
What do you mean by this? Because to me there is a massive difference between a man seeing my body and a man fucking my body.
I think the option is what is least exploitative under capitalism.
Under socialism people will still make porn, and MAYBE people will still do full service sex work.
i think this is true for sure but I think that it's probably safe to say the majority of girls involved in sex work do it because it's the quickest and easiest way to make a shit load of money compared to what they'd be able to do otherwise.
I have friends who are sex workers and it's definitely the case for them, tho they are all into sex a lot anyway but it's still mostly a money/job thing for them.
I think under socialism a lot of people would produce porn but I imagine the vast majority of it probably wouldn't be public, yknow compared to the infinite amount being produced for profit now. And there'd definitely be some people who would just do it for the love of it but I would bet it would be considerably fewer than those would do it because they're in desperate conditions because of capitalism and this is like the one way they can make a lot of money without being born into financial privilege.
9/10 times when making porn a man is gonna be fucking your body.
I think that's a bad ratio, there is a massive market for solo stuff.