Like sure snakes look nice but i would be really fucked up if i had to give it a living or dead rat every half a week or so. Only reason im not vegan is cos of that thin layer of separation between what i eat and the animal it came from, so i dont feel awful everytime i eat, do yall not feel any of that?
why do you care whether the mouse was killed by the snake vs in a small semi-industrial setting a few hundred miles away and frozen?
Analyzing the ethics of how snakes eat in the wild is absolutely deranged.
We're talking about animals kept in captivity. Nobody can control what animals do in the wild.
This is the comment thread we are under. I don't know what you are talking about, but this is explicitly about wild animals, and projecting human morality onto them.
Okay, I understand now. I thought you were referring to my comment about using pre-killed prey for pet snakes.
No, I agree with that. Owning an un-domesticated animal is already bad. Feeding them a live rat does not solve that problem.
Edit: oh, I am under-neath the wrong comment. I understand the confusion. Sorry!
That's actually from a different comment thread.
Because asphyxiation by strangulation is one of the most violent ways to die, whereas
carbon dioxideany method of euthanasia is humane by comparison.http://www.anapsid.org/prekill2.html
nooooooope
Did you mean carbon monoxide or nitrogen or something? The sensation of suffocation is entirely due to CO2 dissolving into your blood.
Suffocating something with CO2 would literally be torture (I'm pretty sure it's been used as a form of torture, by supplying enough O2 the person never passes out)
Yes, nitrogen is better, but CO2 is still better than strangulation, because strangulation still involves the sensation CO2 dissolving into your blood (plus additional terrors).