It's sad how you guys think opposition to U.S. empire excuses lack of labor rights, bans on unionization, and hundreds of billionaires. It displays a real lack of confidence in the socialist mode of production. I think it is entirely possible to be an economic superpower and also socialist. In fact, worker control of the means of production is much more efficient, will result in much more innovation, and is necessary to unlock the working class's full economic potential. Of course the U.S. will interfere with a real socialist state, but they won't win, because socialism is the superior system.
I know China idealists like to think that China is gonna save the world, but you're projecting on to a state whose actions in the last 30+ years have shown no evidence of interest in actually building socialism abroad or at home. Sorry man, but as a materialist, I have to look honestly at the material conditions of the Chinese working class, and not focus on what the leadership has said about what they intend to do in some long distant future.
Replacing U.S. capitalist imperialism (already well past it's 1950s peak), with multipolar Chinese-U.S. capitalist imperialism just doesn't get me excited, sorry.
It’s sad how you guys think opposition to U.S. empire excuses lack of labor rights, bans on unionization, and hundreds of billionaires. It displays a real lack of confidence in the socialist mode of production.
It doesn't. It's purpose is to defeat imperialism, your dream of worker coop China does nothing to make China an economic superpower or defeat imperialism.
In fact, worker control of the means of production is much more efficient, will result in much more innovation, and is necessary to unlock the working class’s full economic potential. Of course the U.S. will interfere with a real socialist state, but they won’t win, because socialism is the superior system.
Ok, well bring that about in whatever western nation you're apart of, because none of that applies to China. The US has defeated several socialist countries through their interference, they're very good at it.
I know China idealists like to think that China is gonna save the world, but you’re projecting on to a state whose actions in the last 30+ years have shown no evidence of interest in actually building socialism abroad or at home. Sorry man, but as a materialist, I have to look honestly at the material conditions of the Chinese working class, and not focus on what the leadership has said about what they intend to do in some long distant future.
Just because you're still better off then them doesn't mean they aren't improving their material conditions. You're in a nation in rapid decline, things will change.
Replacing U.S. capitalist imperialism (already well past it’s 1950s peak), with multipolar Chinese-U.S. capitalist imperialism just doesn’t get me excited, sorry.
This doesn't make any sense, the US is extracting capital from almost every country on earth, they were nowhere near this bad during the cold war.
Lol, your team always sounds like you just came out of a Davos talk on economic development.
"There is no alternative to [state] capitalism. We can only make the lives of workers better by suborning the needs of workers and rigorously disciplining any labor activity. Structural adjustments are needed before unions and universal healthcare can be allowed."
It's sad how you guys think opposition to U.S. empire excuses lack of labor rights, bans on unionization, and hundreds of billionaires. It displays a real lack of confidence in the socialist mode of production. I think it is entirely possible to be an economic superpower and also socialist. In fact, worker control of the means of production is much more efficient, will result in much more innovation, and is necessary to unlock the working class's full economic potential. Of course the U.S. will interfere with a real socialist state, but they won't win, because socialism is the superior system.
I know China idealists like to think that China is gonna save the world, but you're projecting on to a state whose actions in the last 30+ years have shown no evidence of interest in actually building socialism abroad or at home. Sorry man, but as a materialist, I have to look honestly at the material conditions of the Chinese working class, and not focus on what the leadership has said about what they intend to do in some long distant future.
Replacing U.S. capitalist imperialism (already well past it's 1950s peak), with multipolar Chinese-U.S. capitalist imperialism just doesn't get me excited, sorry.
It doesn't. It's purpose is to defeat imperialism, your dream of worker coop China does nothing to make China an economic superpower or defeat imperialism.
Ok, well bring that about in whatever western nation you're apart of, because none of that applies to China. The US has defeated several socialist countries through their interference, they're very good at it.
Just because you're still better off then them doesn't mean they aren't improving their material conditions. You're in a nation in rapid decline, things will change.
This doesn't make any sense, the US is extracting capital from almost every country on earth, they were nowhere near this bad during the cold war.
Lol, your team always sounds like you just came out of a Davos talk on economic development.
deleted by creator
Ok
deleted by creator
You want to bring up the material interests of a country that's just completely eliminated extreme poverty?