• Pezevenk [he/him]
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 years ago

    What the hell does this mean?

    It means that a strategy that is wrong can still provide some temporary benefit to people, even if it's wrong in a grand scale. Securing better working conditions, wages, benefits etc can be much more permanent than something that's just running at a wall after a little while.

    • PhaseFour [he/him]
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 years ago

      You sound like someone who has never been involved in a labor struggle. Securing better working conditions, wages, benefits are no more or less permanent than delaying automation.

      • Pezevenk [he/him]
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 years ago

        You sound like someone who has never been involved in a labor struggle.

        Piss off dude, you know nothing about me.

        Securing better working conditions, wages, benefits are no more or less permanent than delaying automation.

        They are though. Because when you secure a raise, then next time they try to bring it down, you're already starting from a better point, whereas with automation it's just complete defeat when it inevitably turns around.

        Overall my issue isn't with certain unions trying to fight against it temporarily, as I explained that can be good. My issue is with presenting it as an overall direction that people should follow rather than just something unions in particular industries can temporarily use to gain some benefits for their workers.

        • PhaseFour [he/him]
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          when you secure a raise, then next time they try to bring it down, you’re already starting from a better point

          When you secure a wage, inflation erases those gains by the time the next contract is being negotiated.

          Overall my issue isn’t with certain unions trying to fight against it temporarily, as I explained that can be good. My issue is with presenting it as an overall direction that people should follow

          Why should people who consider themselves friends of labor stay silent on the primary issue majors unions (ATU, Teamsters, etc.) are fighting for? That makes absolutely zero sense.

          I'm going to support teachers unions demanding smaller class sizes. I'm going to support truckers unions fighting against automation.

          • Pezevenk [he/him]
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 years ago

            Why should people who consider themselves friends of labor stay silent on the primary issue majors unions (ATU, Teamsters, etc.) are fighting for? That makes absolutely zero sense.

            That's the primary issue US unions are fighting for???

            • PhaseFour [he/him]
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 years ago

              Department of Transportation and industry leaders are projecting that the busing & trucking industries can be fully automated by the early 2030's.

              The struggle against automation is existential to unions in these industries.

              Local contract negotiations only bring up automation when it is forced onto them. Negotiations are still mostly bread and butter. The national unions are focusing primarily on automation right now as a political project, since it is their biggest threat.