Everyone outside the imperial core is subjected to the American/European outside observer, the least you can do is return the favor.
Maybe it'll stop some people from going "China bad this. China bad that" when they haven't read a single letter from someone who lives there.
As someone from a non-American Western Anglosphere nation, the analysis reflects many of our criticisms of the US left. (It also hits a little close to home in places.) Even in other Anglosphere settler-colonial states, the thought of "wiping the slate clean" in terms of political and cultural change is far more acceptable. (in fact, I'd say it's pretty acceptable in Europe to deny "race, blood, and land". Even in Liberal circles there's Pan-European cultural movements.)
That said, not doing much to assuage my fears of the over-dominance of Chinese Nationalism in current Chinese thought (I accept of course that Nationalism and the revival or culture had its critical place in the anti-colonial struggle.)
But that's not the point of the article, which is a much needed view, even if I quibble with a lot of it.
The nationalism is a good thing to be used right now especially with our complete COVID failure and the new cold war. However as China gets more powerful, it could be a problem. Still, it was interesting seeing a Chinese Communist perspective.
A caveat is that Chinese nationalism tends towards ethnonationalism centered around being Han Chinese. I think that’s where most of the problems arise.
Yeah. Qiao Collective has said that the CPC doesn't promote Han Chauvinism, but it needs to really be talked about it more in China itself.
deleted by creator
I'm very well aware of that the as long as the west is shit, nationalism will be a response to it.
I'm also aware that Chinese nationalism is a response to western imperialism.
Western leftist are uncomfortable with nationalism because the nationalism we experience is far right.
deleted by creator
I'm sure you've read Mao's comments on Han Chauvinism, so let's put to bed any suggestion that that's not a thing.
From that starting point, there's nothing crazy about acknowledging there's a tension between a national identity based upon the linguistic and cultural assimilation and respecting the inherent dignity of ethnic, linguistic, and cultural minorities (e.g. the 55 recognized minzu) within the territory.
Minority languages and traditions certainly have influenced the dominant culture; Mandarin and Chinese culture have changed with the times (hence all those cool words from Mongolian and Manchu). And the flexibility of Chinese culture allowed it to persist through, for example, Manchurian rule.
However, there is a tightrope to be walked here. In my post above I specifically was being critical of the tendency towards ethnonationalism. And unfortunately, I think in Party policy we can see those tendencies.
deleted by creator
I'm convinced.
Take a look at this cool trick:
-Hate crimes against Chinese people... bad -Chinese nationalism... also bad
Crazy, right? We can fight against both at the same time! Let's try it again:
-U.S... bad -China... bad
-Jeff Bezos... bad -Jack Ma... bad
It's almost as if the problem was capitalism all along! And the solution is left internationalism! Rosa Luxemburg, for example, was both an ardent internationalist and one of the only people to support the anticolonial uprisings of her day. :thinking face: :thinking face: :thinking face:
deleted by creator
Made me think of this
deleted by creator
Literally asking me to assess a wide-ranging ideology across an entire continent, lol.
If you're asking if I unequivocally support all nationalism in every colonized country, the answer is fuck no. Do I support some left-wing nationalist movements? Hell yes. Do I critically support others? Yes. Are there some were I think nationalism is the wrong answer? Definitely. And that includes China, one of the largest and most powerful countries in the world, where nationalism may have served a purpose in the past, but in my view no longer does. My view on the matter is nicely captured in Rosa Luxemburg's writing on the Polish Question, if you have any further questions.
You're right that my viewpoint is more nuanced than yours--I suspect that I am substantially older than you and (no offense), more deeply read on most of the subjects we have discussed tonight. Perhaps I am wrong, but that's my impression from your breathless approach to posting and the many tweets you use as citations.
Nonetheless, it's good to see your enthusiasm! Building solidarity in person is hard work, and it's good to get the ranting and insults out of the way online before you start attempting real-world praxis.
deleted by creator
no it doesn't.
crud. ok!
deleted by creator
I'm not sure it's a good thing, it may well be a needed thing, and no one can blame them for embracing it after a century of western chauvinism in culture.
But the cost is going to be pretty heavy when it comes due and I hope those ideologically committed comrades in the CCP are ready to deal with it when the time comes to support a more internationalist perspective and a hopefully leading role for China in the building of an international Socialist world..