Is there a specific section where it discusses past successful anarchist revolutions? Or is it just sprinkled throughout the text? I don't see a relevant heading and it's quite a long document.
It's an overall overview of how movements/societies that are/were either explicitly anarchists or weren't anarchist but fit under it's definition worked/work. So it's a book that should be read as a whole.
Is there a specific section where it discusses past successful anarchist revolutions? Or is it just sprinkled throughout the text? I don't see a relevant heading and it's quite a long document.
It's an overall overview of how movements/societies that are/were either explicitly anarchists or weren't anarchist but fit under it's definition worked/work. So it's a book that should be read as a whole.
could you name some successful revolutions then and I'll read this later
I could, but the book does it way better and i'm not in the mood of being mobbed again by the hivemind.
I mean the book is great sure