Because - notwithstanding that I can't read anything regarding detention that doesn't also breathlessly cite Adrian Zens or getting into a discussion about how useless trials are or how a state should appropriately deal with actual people advocating for regime change of a socialist country - the human rights criticism can be equally (if not more so) applied to a whole range of neoliberal countries and it's entirety inappropriate to characterise what OP is doing as "doesn't like human rights abuses".
I'm not saying the guy is a right opinion haver. He's a neolib for god's sake. My point is that chuds are generally nationalist reactionaries of some sort. Chinese liberal opposition is a different beast.
Because - notwithstanding that I can't read anything regarding detention that doesn't also breathlessly cite Adrian Zens or getting into a discussion about how useless trials are or how a state should appropriately deal with actual people advocating for regime change of a socialist country - the human rights criticism can be equally (if not more so) applied to a whole range of neoliberal countries and it's entirety inappropriate to characterise what OP is doing as "doesn't like human rights abuses".
I'm not saying the guy is a right opinion haver. He's a neolib for god's sake. My point is that chuds are generally nationalist reactionaries of some sort. Chinese liberal opposition is a different beast.