• KimJongChill [undecided]
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      Well she shouldn’t say things in an inflammatory and obtuse way, but there are ways to frame things better. Think to yourself how Richard Wolff would have answered this question. It still appeals to libs and it still defends socialism without distorting what socialism is.

        • KimJongChill [undecided]
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          She is part of a long tradition of social-chauvinism that will be coopted into the Democratic Imperialist party and accomplish nothing, like all her predecessors before her, because she is fundamentally compromised and not linked to the global proletariat movement

          The least she could do is not spew imperialist and anti-communist propaganda from her pulpit, but even that is too much to ask.

            • KimJongChill [undecided]
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 years ago

              Great man idealism. People aren’t becoming socialists because of Bernie. Bernie was popular for the same reason socialism in general is becoming more popular, deteriorating material conditions and economic collapses. Bernie is riding a wave, he is not creating it, and suggesting otherwise is idealism.

              Your implication from this is the only way “socialists” (read: left liberals) can gain power is through electoral means. You baked your failure into your own assumptions.