Seriously tho.

And I don't mean that in a dunking kind of way, I just genuinely think it's an interesting way to go about things.

  • LessNephrons1 [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Oh absolutely. Did you know that almost every fishing stock is declining, and the UN has said the oceans will be mostly empty of fish by 2050!

    That's sustainable baby!

    • bottech [he/him]
      3·
      4 years ago

      Im not saying that its not damaging the environment, im saying that fish require less energy per kilogram of meat

          • LessNephrons1 [he/him]
            ·
            4 years ago

            I don't think that's a great metric to measure how good eating fish is. If you look at this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_impact_of_meat_production Under "greenhouse gas emissions " you will see that making(or harvesting) fish produces more GHG emissions per gram of protein than anything except for sheep and beef.

            Also way, way down at the bottom of that list you will find beans. As in the lowest GHG emitter per gram of protein. Just eat some beans.