One point is that because these are rural populations, the raw income numbers are misleading. Substinence farmers use money at a far lower rate than urban poor.
Is that your point or does the article make it? It’s a pretty big point. In fact, it’s like the whole difference between capitalism and communism. In a successful communist society people will be able to live off the land on a large scale without needing money.
Good Article.
One point is that because these are rural populations, the raw income numbers are misleading. Substinence farmers use money at a far lower rate than urban poor.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Is that your point or does the article make it? It’s a pretty big point. In fact, it’s like the whole difference between capitalism and communism. In a successful communist society people will be able to live off the land on a large scale without needing money.