• anthm17 [he/him]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    It's not chauvinist to criticize material conditions.

    What's the point of having a communist party if you are going to allow capitalist working conditions and exploitation? Just pull a USSR and collapse so capitalism can run it's natural course if that's really your take.

    Anyway, for me the material argument that dominates a lot of this is that china is still developing.

    We see they passed the US by some metrics and the constant fear mongering in the US and I feel like I forget that sometimes. If something like poor conditions for otherwise well off tech workers takes time to address because there are still worse problems sucking up attention that makes sense. Workers fighting back also makes sense.

    • Rabid_Dog [they/them]
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      4 years ago

      Conditions are improving year over year. What’s the point of being a communist if you demand instant perfection and ignore the real results in front of your face?

      • anthm17 [he/him]
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        I'm not, making improvements is good.

        That doesn't mean we shouldn't examine and question.

        Learn so much more about China on here from discussion and reading. it's good as long as we don't let it devolve into "China bad".

        • Rabid_Dog [they/them]
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          4 years ago

          When people start making implications that the Chinese capitalists are in control and that the communist party is doing nothing about it, that’s when it is devolving into China Bad and breaching solidarity

      • Kumikommunism [they/them]
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 years ago

        Conditions are improving year over year in America. Like, literally go look up any statistics. Does that make it good? Does that mean you can't criticize America without being a chauvinist?

        You are literally just using neoliberal platitudes like "expanding health care access" and it's just as bullshit. There are no downsides to better worker protections except the loss of profits to capitalists. You're talking about being a good materialist elsewhere, but for SOME REASON ignoring a basic economic motivation for the actual conditions. Hmmm......

        • Rabid_Dog [they/them]
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          Wages, conditions and actual hours worked by employed individuals are worsening in America. As is poverty. Literally the exact opposite trends as China

          • Kumikommunism [they/them]
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 years ago

            Wait, so you agree that wages and conditions are improving in America, but you're arguing elsewhere it's the opposite? What? Also, poverty has been decreasing yearly (likely temporarily) in America. So no.

            • Rabid_Dog [they/them]
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 years ago

              They are not. Wages and conditions are stagnant or worsening in America. Sorry I’ll edit it to clarify that

              • Kumikommunism [they/them]
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                4 years ago

                K cool so you're going to double down and ignore the fact that you are lying about poverty rates I guess.

                Also, just so you know, I can literally pick from any inarguably capitalist country in place of America, and my point would still stand. Any country where these metrics are improving. You would undoubtedly say that there is reason to criticize them, and it wouldn't make sense to try to shut down discussion. But for some reason you think differently here.

                But the fact remains that a lot of workers are subjected to poor working conditions and the only explanation, as a materialist, is that it serves the ruling class. You can not argue that lol