To me, it's an argument of why, in spite of all their shortcomings (either in my privileged lib western eyes, or overall shortcomings) we still need to study historical movements instead of rejecting then based on their imperfections.
It's definitely not saying "it worked there, so let's do that stuff again here"
To me, it's an argument of why, in spite of all their shortcomings (either in my privileged lib western eyes, or overall shortcomings) we still need to study historical movements instead of rejecting then based on their imperfections.
It's definitely not saying "it worked there, so let's do that stuff again here"
Does it make someone a centrist if they stan both Thomas Sankara and Rojava? ...Asking for a friend.
the good kind lol
Marxism-Grillism