Permanently Deleted

    • Civility [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Them not being equivalent is also, literally, the US state department line. The CPC has been trying to equate their handling of Uighur seperatism in Xinjiang with the US "war on terror" since 2001. It kind of worked too. They got Uighur seperatist groups designated as terrorist organisations, did international anti-terror collaborations against them and until 2009 there were even Uighur seperatists imprisoned in Guantanamo Bay.

      What should and have happened, as was suggested in the paper I quoted, was a crackdown on everyone advocating for or planning terrorist acts or violent seperatism while addressing the blatant inequalities between the Uighur people and Han Chinese via affirmitive action and ending the systematic discrimination that was spurring radicalization in the first place and leaving the vast majoriy of the many millions of Muslims and Uighur's who weren't violent or even ideological seperatists to practice their culture and religion in peace.

      Why do you think it's ok for an ethnic and religious minority to be discriminated against systematically and that when that discrimination radicalises a tiny minority of that group into seperatism to address this and double digit numbers of that minority commit terrorist acts in the name of separatism that somehow justifies banning outward expression of that religion and culture practiced by millions and imprisoning everyone who resists?

        • Civility [none/use name]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Hate to break it to you but you might be a reactionary!

          You don't actually mean you're ok with anything so long as it keeps CIA influence as low as possible, as the answer to that is just nuking humanity into extinction (no CIA influence if there's no CIA and no CIA if there's no humans headtappingman.jpg) you mean you're ok with mass racial discrimination and incarceration based on that and are using "combatting CIA influence" to justify it.

          I hope you deworm your brain until racism isn't something you're ok with, but until then, this conversation is over and you can go fuck yourself.

            • Civility [none/use name]
              ·
              4 years ago

              You thinking that mass racial discrimination and incarceration is a necessary, appropriate or even effective measure to stop that is the racist part.

              You're arguing that just because fascists who make up a tiny minority of a religion/culture want an ethnostate of a certain religion/culture that religion/culture should be banned and everyone who practices it despite the ban should be incarcerated (reactionary, implicitly buying into the fascist claim that everyone of a culture/religion should/does want an ethnostate,) and you're somehow only applying this to a group of brown muslims (islamophobic and racist!).

              That you seem to think a fascist ethnostate can only be prevented from forming by eradicating the culture the fascists want to form an ethnostate of is super fucking reactionary and that you're only applying this twisted logic to a group of brown muslims is super fucking racist.

              I'm going to bed now.

              Hope you unfuck your brain.