We pirate movies, games and songs that are made by workers who would undoubtedly make more money if we had bought them instead. Nevertheless we justify piracy by saying that intellectual property is unjust and exploitative.

So wouldn't the same logic apply to OnlyFans? There is currently a movement where people are subscribing to OnlyFans, uploading all the content on porn sites and then unsubscribing. I'm seeing this get criticized, but it's the same things as piracy right? Those who do want to pay will pay, while those who pirate are those who never would have paid in the first place.

    • weshallovercum [any]
      ·
      4 years ago

      The idea that consequentialism is right itself is predicated on the belief that "ends justify means". There is no material basis here.

      Yes, you are right about doctors and lawyers. Similarly, for online sex-workers the MOP are cameras, internet, sex toys and their BODY (not labor, but the physical object of their body). Sex-workers who perform physical sex-work are not petit-bourg, as Marx himself clearly said. Marx classified those as lumpen.

      You still haven't explained why pirating games or movies is morally acceptable.

        • weshallovercum [any]
          ·
          4 years ago

          I’m saying consequentialism is necessary to successfully interact with a system of practical material prescriptions

          Ok lets use consequentialism. Goal : Decommodify the economy and provide free stuff to people. Action : Pirate everything, including porn. Consequence : Some people lose their livelihood, most people gain. So it is morally acceptable to pirate everything.

          You’re trying so desperately to cling to something to be right about, but it’s not gonna happen.

          Pure projection. I'm not the one writing essays about a minor point that is irrelevant to the main argument. I didn't even realize you agreed with me that OF users are petit-bourgs. I see no further reason to argue about whether a body can be MOP or not.