Permanently Deleted

  • kilternkafuffle [any]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Ofc it’s different if it’s a social work year and not army training, but that still leaves the question of what the army should be comprised of.

    True! I guess the logical of democratizing war ultimately means dropping all exemptions (except mental/physical disability) - everyone must have an equal chance to serve. That doesn't mean everyone has to be drafted into soldering, but everyone must have a chance of being drafted by lottery, so that every demographic is represented. An added benefit is every citizen is a potential soldier - every community has veterans capable of resisting oppression by force.

    If your country is actually in danger, then you vote that ~50% of all eligible draftees have to become soldiers next year (and 50% do social work). If war is not on the horizon, then it's only some 5% (and 95% do social work). Actually teaching everyone to fight would pose problems - it's like giving everyone a hammer.

    when the state is overall right wing, it’s just an extra opportunity to pour nationalistic propaganda into impressionable young people.

    No more than at school. And just as at school, when it's you and your peers going through it, you can see through their bullshit better. With a professional army, the young people who already fell for the propaganda are isolated in a bubble.

    I think societies like Israel's have militarized cultures. Conscription is not the linchpin of propaganda, it's just one aspect of the system.

    • sailorfish [she/her]
      ·
      4 years ago

      To be completely honest, I think this is one of those areas of discussion where for me there's a huge difference between a "hypothetical, ideal situation" and my current, specific one.

      When I read through your proposals, I think even if we could quibble over the particularities, I agree with your ideas overall. I think there's a lot of merit to having everyone do a social work year in general, and I think the point about some kind of lottery system for the military is fair.

      But when I think about what if Austria were to do this system tomorrow, I feel immediately revolted. I'm an immigrant from the Soviet region. I do really like Austria. The country is beautiful and I like the people and lifestyle, even if I thought it was the most boring place on earth as a teenager lol. If the conscription was extended to women I don't mind doing the social year. But I just don't wanna pick up a fucking gun for this ex Third Reich country that massacred my relatives. When I visited the local concentration camp last, I searched the names for my grandpa's brother - he was MIA and hey you never know. If I won the 5% lottery I think I'd rather serve the jail time. It's illogical but there you go.

      • kilternkafuffle [any]
        ·
        4 years ago

        I think this is one of those areas of discussion where for me there’s a huge difference between a “hypothetical, ideal situation” and my current, specific one.

        You're totally right! Hypothetically supporting having conscription in an ideal society is different from supporting it in a specific place and time.

        I’m an immigrant from the Soviet region

        Ich auch, aber wohne in der Staaten. Vielleicht verstehen wir einander deshalb )

        But I just don’t wanna pick up a fucking gun for this ex Third Reich country that massacred my relatives.

        The problem here is of course not conscription in Austria, but rather, like with everything else in life, the dissolution of the Soviet Union! Or, more abstractly, anyone having to move to a place that they aren't willing to fight for. I'd see no problem fighting for (denazified) East Germany, for example.