This is literally just a regurgitated form of the Berniebro argument libs have been making since 2015 and considering he's obviously making it in bad faith, he can shove that point up his ass
Accuse one dipshit on twitter of being bad faith and suddenly I'm accusing EVERYONE of being bad faith, wow who knew I was such a troublemaker :bolso-joker:
Defending an elected politician in DC by using a take defined by vague references and a "feeling" about something that is "transparently" happening while at the same time providing NO names, NO examples, NO links, nothing but a random assertion based on.......something that Mr. Breadtuber saw but isn't specifying despite the fact that what he saw is an example of gross transparent sexism in left spaces, you'd think he'd willing to expose these so-called leftists who are engaging in sexism against AOC, but I guess we just have to take his word on it?
Yeah fuck me for not responding positivity to his intentional vagueness and assuming ulterior political motives at play
Let's get this straight I would never accuse other leftists of sexism based solely on my "intuition", if I see sexism infesting a left space, I point it out, I link to it, I name names, and I say this is sexist and here's WHY, I don't hide my accusations behind vagueness and a "feeling", that shit is irresponsible and frankly disgusting, especially taking into account the platform and fanbase this doofus pocesses
And the quality of an idea doesn't survive if it's attached to lazy horseshit like that, which is WHY I called him an UNSERIOUS HACK in the first place
And it didn't take me no "5 times more thought" I literally deduced what's going on seconds after reading the tweet, because it's that obvious when you don't take something at face value
he’s talking about at a specific sort of hypocrisy
He is literally accusing a group of undetermined leftists of hypocrisy, that is the POINT of the tweet, why are you talking about wearing hats?
are you concerned that someone less scrupulous might read this and see it as justification to lump you in with sexist bigots?
Huh, yes that's kinda been the medias and liberals go to take when they want to smear others to their left, accusing leftists of sexism without receipts is what I call accessory to the crime
Oh well that's convenient, when you accuse others of vague crimes and they push back you can just say "I wasn't talking about you, I was talking about those other people who totally represent a sizable faction of the left" the strategy of the coward
couldn’t we just say “that’s a psy-op, that’s a fascist pretending to be one of us”? couldn’t we just say that it’s a fringe minority and they don’t represent us?
Why would we do that? If we have receipts we'd just dunk on those losers instead, why are you assuming we'd be just as dishonest as Big Joel?
deleted by creator
This is literally just a regurgitated form of the Berniebro argument libs have been making since 2015 and considering he's obviously making it in bad faith, he can shove that point up his ass
deleted by creator
oh, no I didn't take random douchebags twitter take seriously, how will I ever expunged this grave sin from my eternal soul, redeem me o lord
deleted by creator
Accuse one dipshit on twitter of being bad faith and suddenly I'm accusing EVERYONE of being bad faith, wow who knew I was such a troublemaker :bolso-joker:
deleted by creator
Defending an elected politician in DC by using a take defined by vague references and a "feeling" about something that is "transparently" happening while at the same time providing NO names, NO examples, NO links, nothing but a random assertion based on.......something that Mr. Breadtuber saw but isn't specifying despite the fact that what he saw is an example of gross transparent sexism in left spaces, you'd think he'd willing to expose these so-called leftists who are engaging in sexism against AOC, but I guess we just have to take his word on it?
Yeah fuck me for not responding positivity to his intentional vagueness and assuming ulterior political motives at play
deleted by creator
Let's get this straight I would never accuse other leftists of sexism based solely on my "intuition", if I see sexism infesting a left space, I point it out, I link to it, I name names, and I say this is sexist and here's WHY, I don't hide my accusations behind vagueness and a "feeling", that shit is irresponsible and frankly disgusting, especially taking into account the platform and fanbase this doofus pocesses
And the quality of an idea doesn't survive if it's attached to lazy horseshit like that, which is WHY I called him an UNSERIOUS HACK in the first place
And it didn't take me no "5 times more thought" I literally deduced what's going on seconds after reading the tweet, because it's that obvious when you don't take something at face value
deleted by creator
He is literally accusing a group of undetermined leftists of hypocrisy, that is the POINT of the tweet, why are you talking about wearing hats?
Huh, yes that's kinda been the medias and liberals go to take when they want to smear others to their left, accusing leftists of sexism without receipts is what I call accessory to the crime
Yes it would, as per his platform
deleted by creator
Oh well that's convenient, when you accuse others of vague crimes and they push back you can just say "I wasn't talking about you, I was talking about those other people who totally represent a sizable faction of the left" the strategy of the coward
Why would we do that? If we have receipts we'd just dunk on those losers instead, why are you assuming we'd be just as dishonest as Big Joel?
deleted by creator
Good fuckin question, maybe Joel can specify
Oh, yeah? You should read the replies under his tweet then
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
No, he's saying the only reason a leftist would like Bernie but would dislike AOC is sexism/racism
deleted by creator
There's a lot of hurt people who spend entirely way too much time online trying to play out their insecurities.