comradeda [he/him,he/him] to askchapo • edit-24 years ago*Permanently Deleted*trashexternal-linkmessage-square45 fedilinkarrow-up127file-text
arrow-up127external-link*Permanently Deleted*trashcomradeda [he/him,he/him] to askchapo • edit-24 years agomessage-square45 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaregarbology [he/him]hexbear16·edit-24 years ago it just eats up resources Mozilla (and Google) make their browsers as light and fast as possible, and because this is capitalism, webdevs make heavier and heavier websites. It's not really Firefox eating resources, it's every single website out there. link
minus-squareFakename_Bill [he/him]hexbear6·4 years agoChrome uses up more resources, I guarantee it link
minus-squareinvalidusernamelol [he/him]hexbear5·4 years agowget and a some sort of html to pdf conversion process followed by printing out each page on a printer? link
minus-squareFakename_Bill [he/him]hexbear4·4 years agoSomeone else might suggest something lighter, but idk. I've always used Firefox link
deleted by creator
Mozilla (and Google) make their browsers as light and fast as possible, and because this is capitalism, webdevs make heavier and heavier websites. It's not really Firefox eating resources, it's every single website out there.
deleted by creator
Chrome uses up more resources, I guarantee it
deleted by creator
That isn't based on chromium? Not really.
wget and a some sort of html to pdf conversion process followed by printing out each page on a printer?
Someone else might suggest something lighter, but idk. I've always used Firefox
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator