She ended up being released in 1974
https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/V%C3%B5_Th%E1%BB%8B_Th%E1%BA%AFng
Thắng was a revolutionary organizer who was captured when she hesitated on an assassination mission because she was unsure of the target and didn't want to kill the wrong man. She made this statement and enigmatic smile after being tortured and - as the caption points out - sentenced to 20 years in a labor camp. What a fuckin' badass.
I want someone to look at me the way she looked at the future of Vietnam.
Ι wrote a lengthy treatise 20 years ago on the Vietnam war. But for some reason you feel entitled to reply to me without ANY credentials and without ANY SOURCES WHATSOEVER.
=================================================================================================================
Now, to make things clear, DO NOT REPLY TO ME until you reach the level of humility and intellectual maturity to sit at the grown ups table and participate in proper debate.
Am I perfectly clear? DO. NOT. REPLY. TO. ME. I have standards and expectations from the people responding to me, and YOU DID NOT MEET THEM. I feel like I have to reiterate that because I question the ability of the juveline tankies in this forum to get the message unless I make it as blatant as possible.
Oh I see. When pressured, you resort to trite and pathetic tactics such as attempting to invalidate my opinions and assassinate my character by pretending I am doing a "bit". Not surprising. Disappointing, but not surprising.
Ok now I’m not even sure if you are doing a bit or not so this is pretty impressive
What must I do to reach your very obvious level of immense humility, my lord?
For starters, GET EDUCATED.
The rhetorical main course will be learning your place and getting your aggressive confidence under check.
As a dessert, do the bare minimum of research on the subject of proper debate and fallacies.
Then we will talk.
Bruh shut the actual fuck up lol “rhetorical main course”
Uhhhh this is a Wendy’s
Alright. Want it explained to you as simply as possible?
Here’s the problem: Nothing here has risen even to the level of “debate”. I’m not here “debating” anything with you, because you keep slapping yourself in the rhetorical face and/or testicles. You’re failing to achieve lift-off. This is a non-starter.
What I’m saying here is that you’re incapable of debate, and incapable of accepting or understanding actual criticism, and think that calling things "bits", strawmen, and ad hominems are standins for meaningful discussion.
This isn’t them. Bardfinn on Reddit just answered my DM and verified they do not have an account on chapo.chat
CEASE THIS VILLAINOUS ATTEMPT AT DISINFORMATION AND CHARACTER ASSASSINATION AGAINST ME IMMEDIATELY.
Thank you. Unfortunately I had to drop an "n" from my name, because it seems like some pathetic lifeless idiot has committed identity theft (a matter which the moderation of this site must attend to IMMEDIATELY) and is impersonating me. As a result, I can not use my real username since it is already "taken", which reflects very poorly on this "community".
