Ι wrote a lengthy treatise 20 years ago on the Vietnam war. But for some reason you feel entitled to reply to me without ANY credentials and without ANY SOURCES WHATSOEVER.
Now, to make things clear, DO NOT REPLY TO ME until you reach the level of humility and intellectual maturity to sit at the grown ups table and participate in proper debate.
Am I perfectly clear? DO. NOT. REPLY. TO. ME. I have standards and expectations from the people responding to me, and YOU DID NOT MEET THEM. I feel like I have to reiterate that because I question the ability of the juveline tankies in this forum to get the message unless I make it as blatant as possible.
Oh I see. When pressured, you resort to trite and pathetic tactics such as attempting to invalidate my opinions and assassinate my character by pretending I am doing a "bit". Not surprising. Disappointing, but not surprising.
Alright. Want it explained to you as simply as possible?
Here’s the problem: Nothing here has risen even to the level of “debate”. I’m not here “debating” anything with you, because you keep slapping yourself in the rhetorical face and/or testicles. You’re failing to achieve lift-off. This is a non-starter.
What I’m saying here is that you’re incapable of debate, and incapable of accepting or understanding actual criticism, and think that calling things "bits", strawmen, and ad hominems are standins for meaningful discussion.
deleted by creator
Ι wrote a lengthy treatise 20 years ago on the Vietnam war. But for some reason you feel entitled to reply to me without ANY credentials and without ANY SOURCES WHATSOEVER.
=================================================================================================================
Now, to make things clear, DO NOT REPLY TO ME until you reach the level of humility and intellectual maturity to sit at the grown ups table and participate in proper debate.
Am I perfectly clear? DO. NOT. REPLY. TO. ME. I have standards and expectations from the people responding to me, and YOU DID NOT MEET THEM. I feel like I have to reiterate that because I question the ability of the juveline tankies in this forum to get the message unless I make it as blatant as possible.
deleted by creator
Oh I see. When pressured, you resort to trite and pathetic tactics such as attempting to invalidate my opinions and assassinate my character by pretending I am doing a "bit". Not surprising. Disappointing, but not surprising.
Ok now I’m not even sure if you are doing a bit or not so this is pretty impressive
What must I do to reach your very obvious level of immense humility, my lord?
For starters, GET EDUCATED.
The rhetorical main course will be learning your place and getting your aggressive confidence under check.
As a dessert, do the bare minimum of research on the subject of proper debate and fallacies.
Then we will talk.
Bruh shut the actual fuck up lol “rhetorical main course”
Uhhhh this is a Wendy’s
Alright. Want it explained to you as simply as possible?
Here’s the problem: Nothing here has risen even to the level of “debate”. I’m not here “debating” anything with you, because you keep slapping yourself in the rhetorical face and/or testicles. You’re failing to achieve lift-off. This is a non-starter.
What I’m saying here is that you’re incapable of debate, and incapable of accepting or understanding actual criticism, and think that calling things "bits", strawmen, and ad hominems are standins for meaningful discussion.
Good bit