• congressbaseballfan [she/her]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Counterparty risk (leverage that blew up on them) caused 2008, so it’s not an unreasonable take. We actually came close to it on Wednesday; hence clearing firms putting in place requirements that forced a number of brokerages to freeze purchases.

    Had that happened, it would probably cause a very brief but severe flash crash, until whatever entity collapsed got bailed out the next day

    • EatTheLibsToo [comrade/them]
      ·
      3 years ago

      The scale of counterparty risk within the dogshit CDOs combined with the sheer volume of them in 2008 is orders of magnitude larger than this though. A flash crash wouldn't come close to bringing about the change prophesied by the people claiming it's all coming down

      • congressbaseballfan [she/her]
        ·
        3 years ago

        Right; that’s why I’m saying it would be a flash crash, it would cause temporary panic, but then there’d be a bailout and it would bounce back, unlike the systemic unraveling of 2008

        • EatTheLibsToo [comrade/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          I was responding mainly to the part in your first comment about it not being an unreasonable take and I misinterpreted, I didn't realise you were talking about what Goldman said. Sorry, I must have jumped to it cos my tolerance for bad takes on the GME stuff is wearing super thin - I'm in a group chat containing some right wing fuckheads and call options and market crashes are their new favourite things to talk absolute bollocks about, so this week has been non-stop cringe and wanting to scream