Usually in relation to Uighur camps, the argument is "since you're in America you can't change whether they're concentration camps or education facilities, so you should just concentrate on the concentration camps within your own borders instead."
Like, motherfucker, I can have an opinion on the actions in another country and still work on changing things I can change.
I guess my question is, is this concentrate on what you can change part of some theory or strategy I haven't read or is it just bad and lazy?
In particular for China it's essentially conceding to the people who thinks there are millions of Uighurs being murdered, rather than attempt to engage and show that there is no evidence of that, and just what abouting.
Yeah this wasn't good and I feel bad about it.
Edit, what I mean it didn't turn out like I meant, although I did learn some good things.
and like the question of what exactly internationalism demands of us is a reasonable and important question to ask
Thanks - I wish I'd worded it like that rather than invoking China as an example. Mistake.
np i still support u comrade