I know "dogmatism" is definitely loaded towards the negative here but that's really the only way I can think to refer to it.

For a specific example, the idea of shutting down and avoiding all criticism of America's geopolitical enemies. I certainly understand where people are coming from with this, and how even leftists aren't immune to state propaganda, but at the same time I have to fall on the "dogmatism is always bad" side. To me it seems like even within a warped and propagandized discourse, shutting down any line of thought uncritically is both a bad general practice and an ineffective way of opposing that line of thought.

  • pepe_silvia96 [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    having nuanced thoughts that you can defend takes too much work. better to be a dumb socialist than an intelligent lib.

    • Liberalism [he/him,they/them]
      hexagon
      ·
      4 years ago

      Nothing wrong with being a dumb socialist, but I don't think dumbness is going to lead a lot of people to socialism

      • pepe_silvia96 [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        yea I try to sound intelligent when I can...looking back I've probably opened my mouth a few too many times. sorry comrades.

        the unfortunate reality with socialist orgs nowadays is they require a commitment to self-education. yea that's great but most people don't have the time or the will to commit to that.

        this is kinda the tragedy of being a marxist. we're so irrelevant that its upon each of us to represent the ideology. being a dumb lib or conservative is a care free experience.