Image is from this article.


Friendly reminder: when commenting about a news event, especially something that just happened, please provide a source of some kind. While ideally this would be on nitter or archived, any source is preferable to none at all given.

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.


Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA daily-ish reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.


The Country of the Week is still Palestine, though we will switch next week to a new country.


Here is the map of the Ukraine conflict, courtesy of Wikipedia.

The weekly (biweekly?) update is here.

Links and Stuff

The bulletins site is down.

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists

Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Add to the above list if you can.


Resources For Understanding The War


Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.

Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.

Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.

Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.

On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.


Telegram Channels

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

Pro-Russian

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.

https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.

https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.

https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.

https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.

https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.

https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.

https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine

Almost every Western media outlet.

https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.

https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


Last week's discussion post.


  • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would argue that you can't accurately evaluate any single geopolitical move the PRC has made post-Korean War without evaluating that move through the lens of whether it would speed up or impede reunification with Taiwan (the move to cross the Yalu River was done to protect is northern borders and help Korean comrades at the cost of quick reunification with Taiwan). For example, Reform and Opening Up greatly sped up reunification with Taiwan and made a nonviolent reunification viable because by opening up, the Mainland attracted Taiwanese businesses that set up shop in the Mainland. From the perspective of a Taiwanese business, the Mainland has a massive domestic market and a government that's more than happy to facilitate business as long as you don't say politically sensitive things like advocate for Taiwanese separatism or suck up hard to Uncle Sam. This is why the KMT, the status quo party, has a reputation of being "the business party." Most Taiwanese businesses prefer the status quo where they're not under the thumb of a communist party but cross straits relations haven't completely deteriorated and blocked access to the Mainland's lucrative market.

    In terms of the conflict that's brewing in WANA, the PRC will most likely not act openly belligerent to any party and advocate for peace talks that nobody including itself takes seriously while covertly help Russia and Iran behind the scenes. This will (slightly) speed up reunification with Taiwan:

    1. By advocating for peace and being the "adult in the room," the PRC makes the case to the Taiwanese people that they are better off as part of the PRC. This contrasts a peaceful PRC against a belligerent US that can't even save its vassals.

    2. By helping Russia and Iran, the PRC contributes in undermining the US even if Hamas, Hezbollah, Ansarallah, et al are doing the heavy lifting. Obviously, as the US declines, it will be less able to defend its vassals and client states, which includes the unsinkable aircraft carrier known as the ROC.

    • BynarsAreOk [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      By advocating for peace and being the "adult in the room," the PRC makes the case to the Taiwanese people that they are better off as part of the PRC. This contrasts a peaceful PRC against a belligerent US that can't even save its vassals.

      I'm not sure #1 is that simple, China advocated for peace in Ukraine but only from a Russian perspective. The adult in the room approach would take a much more neutral/critical attitude towards Russia but in fact its the opposite, they're Russia's #1 ally right now.

      China completely dismissed any claims about helping Russia pretty much in a "its not your business" sort of reply, their rhetoric is "China will be friends with Russia based on historical, ideological and material ties and we wont listen to anybody about it" as a direct response to any and all western criticism.

      So I'm not sure Taiwanese will ever give much credibility to Chinese FP anyway if they hold a western view. In fact its much the same attitude they have towards Taiwan, "we will re-unite, this is a Chinese internal matter and nobody has the right to interfere in any way".

      • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        I'm not sure #1 is that simple, China advocated for peace in Ukraine but only from a Russian perspective. The adult in the room approach would take a much more neutral/critical attitude towards Russia but in fact its the opposite, they're Russia's #1 ally right now.

        This is not necessarily true since China still hasn't rescinded their condemnation of Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014. The condemnation is fairly lukewarm ("We respect the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine"), but it's still there. And it's pretty obvious why they would say that and how it would relate to Taiwan. There's an even more revealing statement in 2014: "We are against any nationality gaining independence through referendums." The Chinese official was 100% thinking about Taiwan and a potential DPP-led referendum. Overall, they walk a fine line between not openly supporting Russia's annexation because it hurts their prospects towards peaceful reunification with Taiwan and not pissing off Russia who sees Crimea as Russian territory.

        So I'm not sure Taiwanese will ever give much credibility to Chinese FP anyway if they hold a western view. In fact its much the same attitude they have towards Taiwan, "we will re-unite, this is a Chinese internal matter and nobody has the right to interfere in any way".

        Like I said, it marginally helps. The US fumbling in Ukraine and Israel and overall being weaker does far more to make reunification attractive, which is why I believe the PRC will covertly back Russia and Iran. When the US withdrew from Afghanistan, Taiwanese media was completely despondent. And it's obviously why. The million dollar question that every Taiwanese person had and Taiwanese media tried to cope with is "will the Americans abandon us like they abandoned the Afghans?" They're watching what's going on right now. As the seed of doubt grows more and more, there's going to be some powerful Taiwanese people who'll start to think, "fuck it, we need to cut a deal with the commies before they invade us and ship us all into a commie labor camp."