I'm being genuine here, some thinks that chacha is an environment for genuine leftist organization while others thinks that this site is just a board to post shit. Forming a consensus around what the purpose of the site is, and developing the site towards that goal will be better for the growth of our community better than any name or any other vanity changes.
Ah that’s extremely disappointing to hear this isn’t just a temporary feature. In a functioning community downvotes serve a very useful purpose IMO, not allowing downvotes is a great way for subtle lib-posting to thrive. I lurked on here a lot when things were getting going last year after the ban but haven’t been on here much the last few months. I kind of hoped this place would turn out to be less heavily moderated than the Chapo sub, that policy makes me question the direction things have gone in. Rules for the sake of rules seems very lib/Reddit-esque.
-Soulja
true, but i guess that's my throughline: is chapo.chat/hexbear.net a functioning community? i'm not willing to write it off , and i'm interested to see it evolve, but i don't know what the "glue" is, so all this rule tweeking and admin drama is a bit inside baseball for me .
IMHO , Downvotes are a very low effort, low cost, broad collapsing of a variation of negative responses one could have, and when i see a chapo.chat/hexbear.net post i've disliked, i tend to ignore it unless i can actually be bothered to effort post. so , does this make me a better community member ? i surely wouldn't be alone in this idea, and i would imagine this interface reflects the structual valuing of the commited poster over the casual , and this might have some influence over why the recent introspection from mods over the tone and direction - because the interface changed the engagment.
Im actually kinda of interested to see if they implement word filtering, and how far they would go with it . sure you can key word search for things, but what about hiding things with words in it as some people have asked for.... Would that negate the need for down votes? eg if you filtered out words used often in struggle sessions you don't appreciate (like the polarising natalism/antinatalism struggle session that tends to happen here) would your experience be more enjoyable and would you be more willing to generate content ? or is it equivalent to sticking your head in the sand? Does anyone on these boards owe each other the right to be heard? or what if the filter was controlled by mods so that certain words couldn't be avoided - We 👏 need 👏 to 👏 talk 👏 about 👏 Hamiliton .
Word filtering!! A world filter controlled by the mods?! That type of power in the hands of the mods tends to only end badly from what I’ve seen, it’s not usually even the fault of the mods themselves... just giving someone that power usually makes them think about how it should be implemented.
I get the appeal of a word filter in theory but i worry it just takes one lib to infiltrate the mod team for that to turn into shadow banning and a very disjointed experience overall. Especially since I worry that perhaps this place isn’t functioning as smoothly as I thought, or at least compared with last time I was hanging around here much more often (October/November last year).
Appreciate the input though, if a word filter is ever introduced I nominate “Archibald Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor” for first entry. Cheers
-Soulja
deleted by creator