At the end of the video, Is Bill Gates injecting MICROCHIPS in people?!, Thought Slime gives a shout out to a video, Challenging the Counter-Narrative - Uighur Genocide Denial.

Here is Thought Slime's comment (from 14:04 in his video):

"Who's ready to learn about an ongoing genocide? Shafi Sekalala... has made a fantastic video going over the evidence for the Uyghur genocide in China. As well as addressing the points usually cited to pretend as though it isn't happening or isn't a big deal. Lot of people in the online leftist community go to bat for the CCP's treatments of the Uyghur minority and it's disgusting to see. This video is as concise and to the point as you're going to get on the subject. And if you ever need a handy reference to the apologetics for the CCP's genocide, this will be useful for you."

That video is now privatised. In its place, the creator has uploaded a new video, Footnote about the Xinjiang Video, in which the creator states the following about his first video:

One thing I noticed about a month after I had published it, was that holy shit, do I not know anything.... I felt like it'd be much more honest for me to just make it private and make this footnote.... I feel like I only touched the iceberg when I originally wrote the first video. It was really surface level.... I just felt like having it be out there... especially with my application of the word "genocide" was dishonest of me, especially when I was skeptical of Zenz's at the beginning... Just wanted to be honest and to come out and say I'm not well read on the issue, I'm not an expert, I will refer you to experts because they know much more than me.

On Adrian Zenz, he further elaborates:

Adrian Zenz is a questionable individual. From what I'm aware he doesn't speak Mandarin or, I'm gonna guess, Uyghur, that's the language they speak. So, off the bat, how're you gonna be an expert on something like that?

The article about sterlization I'm very skeptical of... unless any data comes out that affirms his view that there is a sterilization campaign... because I haven't read anything else that goes much deeper into the issue.

He instead directs people to a blog, wokeglobaltimes, for two reasons:

...they've made a very helpful page that directs you to their articles as well as other documents that talk about the issue more extensively...

One article that this blog, wokeglobaltimes, talks about is about Zenz... It sort of reviews his study and his methodology... about this other study he did in which he tried to come up with the argument that... the Chinese government were building detention centers that were militarized and served the purpose of internment. That's the argument he tried to make and he did numerous different surveys and looked at the different bidding for contracts from construction companies and it seems pretty solid.

The article, Breaking Down the Xinjiang Crisis, is the overall page he was referring to, with this one specifically going into the claims about internment centers.

Overall, here are his thoughts of what is going on:

There is definitely a campaign of incarceral violence, police violence, a police state has been set up in Xinjiang, for the purpose of ensuring that separatist movements do not begin to develop there.... If you think it's for the purpose of stopping terrorism, you're delusional.... It's very clearly for the purpose of ensuring that no separatist movements develop. Why? It's monetarily beneficial to the capitalist class of China to have Xinjiang as a region which has lots of resources as well as a gateway out of China for the Belt and Road Initiative which is imperialism.... It's beneficial to have this ethnic minority not really develop any sense of nationalism....There's ample evidence of Islamophobia within party policy, within the law etc., and to say everything is 'happy smiley' is delusional....

I wonder if Thought Slime still stands by his original comment, or if he's similarly changed his stance. I also wonder what people think about the blog and their Xinjiang coverage. From a quick skim, it at least seems a lot more in-depth than the typical liberal or reactionary news sources.