I support veganism but I don't think morality should play a role because there is no objective or certain moral law, but we end up in the same spot because I believe it is up to beings to assert the vision they want to see of the world, and one without killing (especially of feeling beings) is better.
You or someone else is certain they've found the true, objective moral laws to guide action; what do you do when someone disagrees and you can't convince them? Rely on actual, human and constructed laws with physical, social, personal consequences.
Somehow that assertion doesn't do anything to make a case for moral universals or their objectivity.
It may have been a while but from what I've read I think Marxists also believe the state should be used when the outcome is not subject to being influenced by discourse?
I support veganism but I don't think morality should play a role because there is no objective or certain moral law, but we end up in the same spot because I believe it is up to beings to assert the vision they want to see of the world, and one without killing (especially of feeling beings) is better.
You or someone else is certain they've found the true, objective moral laws to guide action; what do you do when someone disagrees and you can't convince them? Rely on actual, human and constructed laws with physical, social, personal consequences.
This is just moral nihilism mixed with a liberal conception of the state.
deleted by creator
Somehow that assertion doesn't do anything to make a case for moral universals or their objectivity.
It may have been a while but from what I've read I think Marxists also believe the state should be used when the outcome is not subject to being influenced by discourse?