Tarot is one individual human, with all our senses and empathy, reading the expressions and cues of another human. It's more reliable than pollling like 538 haha, and I even 'believe in' statistics etc
First genuine insult someones given a take of mine on this site! :red-fist:
All polling 'science' boils down to how a group of libs/chuds feel on any give day haha it's not great, and it's not terrible. I've taken a university-level statistics course I so do understand at least the basics. It's fair to question the validity of opinion polling without just globally condemning "data scientists" imo haha.
Maybe you underestimate the power of cold reads! They're a pretty powerful thing, especially between two people who are being open with one another. Think less 'magic/crazy people I disagree with' and more 'counselor/therapist/psychiatrist getting a strong enough sense of who a person is in ~15 minutes to be able to help them'.
This shitposting comment chain that began with "FiveThirtyEight is tarot for straight men" now demands academic rigour!
You haven't said anything substantive beyond 'con men doing cold readings'. I think we both agree that stats are valuable, just trying to point out that that particular mode of communication can be valuable. Have a good one!
Not really. Statistics are more related to the real world than tarot, which isn't at all
Statistics are just as worthless without insight.
Tarot is one individual human, with all our senses and empathy, reading the expressions and cues of another human. It's more reliable than pollling like 538 haha, and I even 'believe in' statistics etc
Con men doing cold readings are more reliable than data scientists.
First genuine galaxy brain take I've seen on this site.
First genuine insult someones given a take of mine on this site! :red-fist:
All polling 'science' boils down to how a group of libs/chuds feel on any give day haha it's not great, and it's not terrible. I've taken a university-level statistics course I so do understand at least the basics. It's fair to question the validity of opinion polling without just globally condemning "data scientists" imo haha.
Maybe you underestimate the power of cold reads! They're a pretty powerful thing, especially between two people who are being open with one another. Think less 'magic/crazy people I disagree with' and more 'counselor/therapist/psychiatrist getting a strong enough sense of who a person is in ~15 minutes to be able to help them'.
Without anything more substantive than 'lol haha chuds imo haha' and liberal use of scare quotes...
This shitposting comment chain that began with "FiveThirtyEight is tarot for straight men" now demands academic rigour!
You haven't said anything substantive beyond 'con men doing cold readings'. I think we both agree that stats are valuable, just trying to point out that that particular mode of communication can be valuable. Have a good one!
"Just a prank bro!"
bro! how substantive!
trying to have it both ways lol
It's a better take than anything you've thus far posted.
Because I can maintain a sense of identity without basing it on making childish hot takes
You’ve yet to prove that.
Imagine how much more like you I would be if I felt the need to prove myself to someone like you
By virtue of continuing to reply you have already proven yourself interested in doing so
Not the first stupid thing you've said