Batista also was not a hereditary monarch operating under a centuries old divine right to rule, meaning his kids mean fuck all to anyone compared to the Romanovs.
If you're gonna do a lazy comparison to anything, at least do it to Puyi and the Chinese revolution so theres some kind of point that doesnt fall apart in the basic definitions.
The tsar did not willingly go into the custody of the Bolsheviks, he abdicated to the Provisional government and when the October revolution happened the royals simply had no resources to do anything about it.
And its very easy to theorize about possible alternative strategies but most would probably just have been seen as impractical or ineffective, holding the tsars kids as hostages would probably have lead to the white armies attempting to "call the bluff" or just not caring in the face of eradicating bolshevism, as well as moving them being a risky proposition due to the possibility of collaborators or spies making a move when not in a fortified position.
I don't know who started this trend of pretending every unfortunate but considered necessary action that one's side performs is actually cool and awesome.
Real "Slay Queen Madeline Albright 500000 Kids" energy.
Wherent some white forces getting closer than usual that week ? Yeah they probably got drunk and made that decision but presenting it some "i just woke up and decided to kill the tsar family for no real reason" is missing some context
Yes and "tHeY KiLLeD tEh rOmAnOv KidDeRiNoS nOoO" is also a longstanding anti-communist talking point, so it's fucking hilarious seeing it pop up here.
deleted by creator
:owned:
Based. More evidence that self-organizing power structures deliver good results.
Also I applaud getting blind drunk before yeeting the rich.
deleted by creator
love to focus group solutions to ending monarchism for maximum syngergy in the marketplace of ideas in the middle of a people's revolution lol
deleted by creator
:fidel-si:
deleted by creator
Batista also was not a hereditary monarch operating under a centuries old divine right to rule, meaning his kids mean fuck all to anyone compared to the Romanovs.
If you're gonna do a lazy comparison to anything, at least do it to Puyi and the Chinese revolution so theres some kind of point that doesnt fall apart in the basic definitions.
deleted by creator
The tsar did not willingly go into the custody of the Bolsheviks, he abdicated to the Provisional government and when the October revolution happened the royals simply had no resources to do anything about it.
And its very easy to theorize about possible alternative strategies but most would probably just have been seen as impractical or ineffective, holding the tsars kids as hostages would probably have lead to the white armies attempting to "call the bluff" or just not caring in the face of eradicating bolshevism, as well as moving them being a risky proposition due to the possibility of collaborators or spies making a move when not in a fortified position.
deleted by creator
If I could do it again, I'd have also killed Batista and his kids.
deleted by creator
How do you know I'm not really me tho
deleted by creator
I'm a tastemaker.
deleted by creator
damn this is a good question
deleted by creator
Yes, also:
:owned:
I don't know who started this trend of pretending every unfortunate but considered necessary action that one's side performs is actually cool and awesome.
Real "Slay Queen Madeline Albright 500000 Kids" energy.
Wherent some white forces getting closer than usual that week ? Yeah they probably got drunk and made that decision but presenting it some "i just woke up and decided to kill the tsar family for no real reason" is missing some context
Yes and "tHeY KiLLeD tEh rOmAnOv KidDeRiNoS nOoO" is also a longstanding anti-communist talking point, so it's fucking hilarious seeing it pop up here.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator