Edamamebean [she/her]

  • 2 Posts
  • 176 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 7th, 2023

help-circle



  • The anti lunch break stance makes sense for a tory politician, but what does she have against sandwiches? She claims she eats steak for lunch, does she cook it the night before and eat a cold steak at her desk while she works? Does she cut it up into bite sized pieces before as well? Because there is no way you can cut up a steak and eat it while working. You can sit at your desk and pretend you're working, but you cannot cut up a steak and eat it while working unless you have three hands. None of this makes any goddamn sense.




  • Edamamebean [she/her]toSlop.[CW: misoginy, non-vegan] Hmm,
    ·
    16 days ago

    You don't need to boil lasagna noodles before putting them in the baking dish. Regular lasagna noodles, they don't need to be the weird already soft ones. People overcomplicate lasagna. You can literally just dump a bunch of ingredients in a baking dish and it's gonna be good. Sure it's not gonna be the most gourmet lasagna you've ever tasted, but who cares? I don't. I prioritize ease and time saving when home cooking. I would boil myself and then climb in the oven before I would ever waste my time parboiling pasta.



  • Adding to this, I hate transit stations that don't have ticket machines. The BRT station near me has an indoor waiting area, wifi, an arrivals board, but no ticket machines. Gotta go to some random convenience store almost a kilometre away to reload your card instead. Why do they do this.


  • Edamamebean [she/her]totraingangPost your transit pet peeves
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Oh my god, there are far too many to name and I'm always looking for someone to listen to my ranting about terrible transit. Sorry, but for asking this question you're now going to get a very large wall of text.

    1: A lack of signal priority. Countless hours of collective human time have been wasted in transit vehicles waiting at completely empty intersections for a red light to change because the traffic signal uses the state of the art technology called a timer.

    2: Terrible right of way. Way too many transit agencies place their transit lines not based on where demand is highest or where transit will be most effective, but just where land is cheapest or where the transit agency already owns. The principal rapid transit line in my city runs along a river because the city already owned the land, but it means that literally half of the area surrounding the transit line is just completely useless because it's water. Highway median transit is another example of this, which can often lead to…

    3: Terrible land use surrounding stations. Almost without fail transit stations in North American cities are surrounded by parking lots, highway interchanges, or just straight up undeveloped land.

    4: The North American light rail obsession. Nearly every single new or recently built rapid transit line in the US or Canada is done using trams, often running partially on the street, with absolutely no consideration for if this is the right transit solution for a given city. Link in Seattle is a good example. It's absolutely absurd for a city the size of Seattle to have light rail. A city of 4 million people in any other developed nation would have a proper metro, but because Seattle is in America it gets a shitty light rail.

    I may return to update this later but this was all I could write for now





  • Edamamebean [she/her]toSlop.Flat Earth Feminism
    ·
    28 days ago

    Wow... This explains why men don't know about the womb pouch, and how it's literally impossible for women to have a flat stomach because our superior internal organs stick out. Women stay winning 💅








  • I don't think that's true. Cringe comedy certainly punches down sometimes, as many types of comedy do, but to say it is "inherently down punching" seems pretty rediculous to me. There are plenty of examples of cringe comedy where the majority or all of the cringing is being done at bad people, or people who hold power over others. It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia is a good example. That show definitely has problematic aspects, but pretty much 100% of the cringe moments in it are because of awful stuff the awful main cast are doing. Even going back to the Office, which I don't really like either, I'd argue the majority of cringing that happens is at the expense of Michael, the racist, sexist boss. Obviously both these shows have problematic aspects like most comedy does, and I'm not defending them, but I do think it's kind of rediculous to say that cringe comedy is inherently reactionary, or that it inherently punches down on marginalized people. I won't deny many examples of it do, but that's not because of some inherent flaw in the medium, it's because we live in a deeply racist, sexist, ableist, homophobic and transphobic society, and our popular media reflects that.