One pet peeve that gets to me is something that's done on a lot of commuter railways and S-Bahns, the 10/20 minute schedule. The schedule looks like:
2:10
2:20
2:40
2:50
3:10
etc, when it should be like this:
2:10
2:25
2:40
2:55
3:10
This minimizes waiting and allows for frequent service every 15 minutes..
What are your pet peeves?
No regional trains for most of the night. I should be able to get home from the big city between the hours of 22 and 6
The unending ambiguity of how to pay at an unfamiliar transit system.
You don't all have to use the same system but it'd be nice if your websites all actually said it somewhere easy to find. And said it at all.
In USA, there isnt consistent funding to build new lines. This leads to great inneficiency and more cost overruns when a new workforce needs to be built from the bottom up and properly trained to complete one project, and is then disbanded.
In SD, we recently (well, its been like 2 years now) finished a long awaited extension of one of our 3 light rail lines. But once it was complete, the contractors involved disbanded because we can only build one line every 30 years i guess. There is talk of the next line, but it probably wont break ground until 2040 or later. Land wont get cheaper, wages wont get lower, and now the entire apparatus of contractors to build it will have to be built back up.
If we could preemptively fund and plan multiple extensions and new lines to be built consecutively, according to a comprehensive plan, things would be done much faster and cheaper. The way it typically is in the USA though is just comrpomosed piecemeal additions every decade or two, that will never add up to a comprehensive transit system
In my area it's that we only have buses and the maximum frequency is 30 minutes, which the system only achieves on a few lines M-F from 6-18:00. Otherwise it's like a 1-2 hour frequency.
Oh, and we have a train station but there's only 2 trains in the morning and 2 in the evening and they're so slow and cost so much fucking money that there's no point in ever taking them into the city. There's legitimately no use case for them as a commuter train because they wouldn't get you downtown early enough and leave too early to catch after work and a round trip is like $34. The only use is if you're taking a long distance trip and even then it costs so much more than any other option while being 2x slower than driving and 6-7x slower than flying. Why, yes, it is Amtrak. How did you know?
When it's cold out so you bundle up but they blast the heat in the cars so you have to strip off all your cold weather clothes to avoid sweating through them
I get why they do it like that. But maybe just not so hot? Just normal temperature?
Anything more than 10 minutes between vehicles during peak time is absolutely unacceptable for a transit system, no matter how low the ridership is. From (at the very least) 8am-6pm you should be able to walk out at any time and catch a bus/train without planning
And I say “no matter how low the ridership is” because if it’s longer than 15 minutes your ridership is going to stay low because it’s easier to drive.
Love having headways that are 30 minutes and the stops for two lines at a key transfer point are perfectly timed so that you’ll just miss it as you get off and be forced to wait for half an hour.
Buses. Fuck buses. Replace all buses with subways, separated street cars, bike lanes, and trains accordingly.
-
Massive train/metro station platforms with just a couple of benches and a small fraction of it covered. Most people have to wait in the rain / baking sun.
-
Buses / trains not running at night.
-
On-level pedestrian crossings of railroads with ridiculously loud "incoming train" bells
-
Transit stops that are actively hostile to people wanting to use them. Removing shade/shelter/benches and generally making them unpleasant as possible. They always says it's to "save money" or "improve safety" but it's always clear it's to prevent people who are homeless from using them for the smallest bit of comfort.
Recently they started renovating transit stops near me to remove any enclosed warm places (important when it regularly reaches 0°F or colder) where someone could wait, and it's not unusual to have 15 minute+ waits.
Oh my god, there are far too many to name and I'm always looking for someone to listen to my ranting about terrible transit. Sorry, but for asking this question you're now going to get a very large wall of text.
1: A lack of signal priority. Countless hours of collective human time have been wasted in transit vehicles waiting at completely empty intersections for a red light to change because the traffic signal uses the state of the art technology called a timer.
2: Terrible right of way. Way too many transit agencies place their transit lines not based on where demand is highest or where transit will be most effective, but just where land is cheapest or where the transit agency already owns. The principal rapid transit line in my city runs along a river because the city already owned the land, but it means that literally half of the area surrounding the transit line is just completely useless because it's water. Highway median transit is another example of this, which can often lead to…
3: Terrible land use surrounding stations. Almost without fail transit stations in North American cities are surrounded by parking lots, highway interchanges, or just straight up undeveloped land.
4: The North American light rail obsession. Nearly every single new or recently built rapid transit line in the US or Canada is done using trams, often running partially on the street, with absolutely no consideration for if this is the right transit solution for a given city. Link in Seattle is a good example. It's absolutely absurd for a city the size of Seattle to have light rail. A city of 4 million people in any other developed nation would have a proper metro, but because Seattle is in America it gets a shitty light rail.
I may return to update this later but this was all I could write for now
Frequent lack of TOD in America. Building new transit should be an opportunity to build whole new dense neighborhoods, and instead we make park and rides.
It's supposed to be some kind of olive branch to suburbanites but they largely fucking hate transit anyway. What gets me is building rail parallel to an interstate so a huge amount of possible TOD space is taken up by the worst civil infrastructure ever built.
Yeah where I live every train station is a huddle of towers. I don't necessarily love towers but I think this is a good way to build them if we're going to have them.
the train on my rural line doesn't run at 3am when i have to go to work
Shutting down every night for maintenance.
Like I'm not saying it shouldn't be done, I'm sure it's important to regularly maintain tracks and cars but dang couldn't it be open a little later to allow people to take the train home from the club
Two hour beaks in schedules. It sucks if your teacher out of nowhwhere decides to run class for an extra 15 minutes.
For real, idk why everyone looks so shocked when im privately in the back jorkin my beanits and bothering nobody
Could your turn the porn your watching on your phone down a bit please