What urged you to respond this angry to me 3 days later? Lol if people are responding to you thinking you're saying something you're not, that's on your communication, not basically everyone else's reading comprehension.
Calm down man, you're taking the leftist shitpost site seriously :PIGPOOPBALLS:
Sorry to be the one to tell you here buddy, but the lib of the thread is you. If you unironically view politics as "vote or die" you have liberal brain
Telling people with no time to read is praxis
100%, my ex just saw it as a body horror about horse people
It's still a good bit, be proud of your posting instincts
Someone already did this bit 2 days ago, sorry to be the one to tell ya
I think the best thing you can probably do is organize people in your area to prevent people from coming in. By educating them or just simply blocking the entry, not on the property if you can prevent it.
That is of course, after trying to reason with your landlord, don't want to escalate first if you can prevent it.
But of course I'm just some shithead, maybe the guy saying take a shit in the cabinet is right
Responded to BASED_BALL above (or probably below after I comment)
It's people asking follows for follows and signal boosting each other. Comrades shouldn't have less than 1k followers kinda thing.
It kinda feels to me like something to get a information network of leftists to me. A trending hashtag asking you to self identify? Kinda sus to me
Pretty sure he means just like a quick and easy how to guide. A "piracy" "primer", not a "piracy primer", it's no specific term for something.
As someone whose plan is also that, I feel as if maybe we should get better at planning
I cannot believe it took 12 people to write this mess.
Here's a sample quote to show how little these men understand basic sex/anatomy shit
Notably, across these studies, bisexual-identified men self-reported subjective arousal to both male and female stimuli, even in samples where their genital arousal did not reflect such a pattern.
Not to mention this bit where they seem to imply all women are bisexual, throwing out any credibility of their findings in the first paragraph of the fuckin abstract lmao
Patterns of physiological (genital) arousal to male and female erotic stimuli can provide compelling evidence for male sexual orientation. (In contrast, most women provide similar physiological responses to male and female stimuli.)
Hey Quill, I've interacted with you a few times on the Discord. You come across like a very cool and inviting person! I'm sorry you've had to deal with all of this. I'm sure most of us libs trust you and the rest of the mod team here, solidarity forever :red-fist:
He's referring to the class reductionist claims he did a few weeks back. Called Peter Coffin, Angie Speaks, and a number of other leftists (and fuckin Glen Greenwald lumped in for some reason) class reductionists, then used that to try to get them to come on his show and defend themselves.
It was pretty laughably clear he hasn't really engaged with any of their work if he was calling them class reductionists. And he kinda called out Angie specifically as dumb (his words) even though her and Peter Coffin have the same core ideology and say the same things re:class and race. It was just kinda weird he listed a ton of white people then one black woman who he called dumb specifically.
Here's one of the clips. You can find more Twitter drama about this if you go to like any of their timelines on the 17/18th.
Don't worry everyone, I'll keep the dirty poors away from you
Same here, I think I posted maybe one or two comments back in the subreddit, but Discord turned me a bit too. Certainly helps that the emotes make shitposting way easier and more fun, glad those have been brought over
:og-hex-bear: :john-brown: :heart-sickle: :stalin-shining: :AyyyyyOC: :PIGPOOPBALLS:
Those were typically the hours I was in the People's Pod channel too, definitely the star of the show the voice chat. Forced my lib ass to listen to theory quite a few times and quite a few interesting conversations. I've been in voice channels with a fifth the amount of people that were noise filled hell holes
Goldman Sachs isn't exactly a common podcast sponsor that that excuse could work for. It's not about why she'd accept the money (even though it is) it's about why they would want to sponsor her in the first place.