Here's a sample quote to show how little these men understand basic sex/anatomy shit
Notably, across these studies, bisexual-identified men self-reported subjective arousal to both male and female stimuli, even in samples where their genital arousal did not reflect such a pattern.
Not to mention this bit where they seem to imply all women are bisexual, throwing out any credibility of their findings in the first paragraph of the fuckin abstract lmao
Patterns of physiological (genital) arousal to male and female erotic stimuli can provide compelling evidence for male sexual orientation. (In contrast, most women provide similar physiological responses to male and female stimuli.)
I cannot believe it took 12 people to write this mess.
Here's a sample quote to show how little these men understand basic sex/anatomy shit
Not to mention this bit where they seem to imply all women are bisexual, throwing out any credibility of their findings in the first paragraph of the fuckin abstract lmao
if this is scientific progress then wait till i drop the bomb on you guys about madden 2021's cover art
hint: it has to do with MS paint
Fuck those covers and EA for trying to be super trendy. It got this "Fellow Kids" vibe.
'measuring genital arousal' seems like a weirdly limited method of determining attraction, right?
It feels excessively mechanistic and also really linked to Christian attitudes towards sexuality.
especially considering the classic no reason boner
nice to know there are nsp fans around here. sexy jewish ninjas will write the soundtrack of the revolution :red-fist: