They measured penis growth when they showed them different kinds of porn. The caliphers are back.
Check my previous post
None of these people have ever held their friend's fat fucking cock in their hands as it engorged with excitement while theirs did the same.
Edited by Steven Pinker, Harvard University
he managed to stop fucking kids long enough to edit this?
i disagree, neanderthals had to have had huge cocks. they had donkey dick, and if he doesnt think so then hes a lying bastard. what a fucking pussy
published 20 July 2020
Nice to see science has finally ‘discovered’ bi men.
Finally we "have all the facts" and can move forward with a public-private policy initiative.
Why the fuck would anyone be skeptical of the fact that guys can like both guys AND girls? I genuinely don't understand where that idea would come from
There was a poorly designed but very influential study that supposedly showed men only displayed arousal towards either men or women.
I feel so validated. Until 3 weeks ago I was agonizing over whether I wanted to choose to be homosexual or heterosexual
There's a sex researcher email chain that goes around called SexNet. I don't think there is a way to publically access it, but it's both hilarious and horrifying. I mention this because Michael Bailey runs it, and is an absolute ass. Reading through the logs, there are so many amazing takedowns of his stupid ideas and arguments. It's not as good as Dave Rubin's subreddit which is all about how he sucks, but SexNet has plenty of researchers on the list with good politics who are able to mercilessly smack him around. I'll post if I can remember any particularly great exchanges.
Wasn't there some study that showed that homosexual men have longer penises? I think that's hilarious.
Well when I do it my penis does get bigger, but eventually goes back to normal
yeah, that's like a critical threshold thing. more, concentrated dicksucking and it should stick
The penis shape of the homosexual is uniquely evolved for anal
I cannot believe it took 12 people to write this mess.
Here's a sample quote to show how little these men understand basic sex/anatomy shit
Notably, across these studies, bisexual-identified men self-reported subjective arousal to both male and female stimuli, even in samples where their genital arousal did not reflect such a pattern.
Not to mention this bit where they seem to imply all women are bisexual, throwing out any credibility of their findings in the first paragraph of the fuckin abstract lmao
Patterns of physiological (genital) arousal to male and female erotic stimuli can provide compelling evidence for male sexual orientation. (In contrast, most women provide similar physiological responses to male and female stimuli.)
if this is scientific progress then wait till i drop the bomb on you guys about madden 2021's cover art
hint: it has to do with MS paint
Fuck those covers and EA for trying to be super trendy. It got this "Fellow Kids" vibe.
'measuring genital arousal' seems like a weirdly limited method of determining attraction, right?
It feels excessively mechanistic and also really linked to Christian attitudes towards sexuality.
nice to know there are nsp fans around here. sexy jewish ninjas will write the soundtrack of the revolution :red-fist:
How someone so shitty is still considered a respectable academic is beyond me
OH HOLY SHIT, REALLY? DUDE I DIDNT FUCKING KNOW THATS INSANENFKFODNGKEIVKEOCDICPD8JF9DKMRPOCQONCODOVRMFKFO
