When you are on molly they let you do anything

this would happen when I'm in twitter jail

It's so nakedly an allegory for capitalism

Hide your power levels

Yeah fuck AOC

Houston is actually more walkable than you'd think. Because of the lack of zoning most neighborhoods have at least a gas station within walking distance

Removed by mod

Got a soft spot for Dorsey ngl, seems like the least evil one

Golf is fun

I know this is using current state borders but eastern Oregon and Washington would 100% be part of Idaho

That's my post lol. You might be fine but I literally went through 3 screens on my pixel before I ditched it. Two of those were incidents where the glass wasn't broken but the screen was completely unresponsive. According to the repair guy I talked to the screen is super thin

Pixel 4a has massive screen issues. Avoid it

https://www.reddit.com/r/GooglePixel/comments/klas5q/pinch_to_zoom_not_working_on_4a_after_update/

Need to ban evil-shaming

Wonder why it hasn't gained any users this year

Lmao this site has really gone off the rails

The reason we haven't seen inflation (among other things) is because of wage stagnation. The idea that pure money supply drives inflation so complete bullshit. That said I think we will see inflation if wages start to rise. It sucks but it 100% fits into marxism.

ELI5 why wages drive inflation:

1. Inflation isn't in a vaccumn, it is only felt when the price of things go up

2. Higher wages mean things cost more

3. Higher wages mean consumers have more money which means they are willing to spend more

I think what sets China apart is that their reforms were completely illiberal. Jack Ma is allowed to exist but ultimately he is a slave to the party

This is why I loved living in houston. No zoning so you actually had stuff in walking distance for a town that is so spread out

If wikipedia is to be trusted on this, the Incans were not socialist. Which is fine, you really can't be socialist without capitalism first existing.

"The Inca Empire functioned largely without money and without markets. Instead, exchange of goods and services was based on reciprocity between individuals and among individuals, groups, and Inca rulers. "Taxes" consisted of a labour obligation of a person to the Empire. The Inca rulers (who theoretically owned all the means of production) reciprocated by granting access to land and goods and providing food and drink in celebratory feasts for their subjects."

That's literally just feaudalism with zero money instead of a little

Really tho?