Hasan Piker is one of the biggest streamers on Twitch, which is quite the accomplishment because the platform was originally for gamers, but he does political commentary. With over 2.2 million followers on Twitch, 1.1 million on Twitter, and 1 million on YouTube, he has quite the influence. He’s a hardcore “eat the rich” type pro-socialist leftist, but he’s not who he appears to be.
He doesn't just "have a bachelor's". He graduated cum laude with a double major from an elite university, Rutgers. Maybe to you that's not an academic, but it sure looks like it to the rest of us. He also benefited from nepotism, which our elites also consider a sacred institution.
"Being an academic" requires you to have a doctorate or at least be teaching on your way to a doctorate. Quite literally having a doctorate means that you are qualified to teach your subject within academia, thus rendering you an academic. Mind, this is not academic shit, this is pedantic nerd shit.
I'm not a huge fan of either academics or Hasan, but him not calling himself an academic despite having gone to an elite institution is absolutely the correct take. Which is the problem with Hasan, where most of his takes are good despite his nepotism, overwhelming wealth and completely useless job.
If the choice for 'Marxism' is between Hasan and whatever person wrote this essay, I'm sorry but I am choosing Hasan because at least Hasan isn't doing stupid misrepresentation of arguments (most of the time, his clip on TJ was pretty cringe). Fortunately, this isn't some sort of binary and there can be nuance where both of Hasan and articles ranting about Hasan are cringe.
That’s just straight up not what “being an academic” means tho.
“Academic” is an occupation. It usually requires a certain level of education (usually a doctorate or being in the process of getting a doctorate) but primarily it’s a job description for people who get paid to teach at Universities (or other academic institutions) and publish papers in academic journals.
Oh, is that what is happening here? Go complain to a homeless person about how Hasan is an elite academic and not a real anti-capitalist, I'm really sure they will care.
ok now I can't tell if you posted this to dunk on the writer or Piker lol. but I'll assume you're trying to dunk on Piker. graduated cum laude (on financial aid because I'm poor) and I was not a good student, all you need to do is get a B average, it's not some special thing. to me that just sounds like he had enough money to go to a good school. I used to work with a total dip shit who went to Columbia just because his dad is some pharmaceutical executive and could afford it. just having rich parents and going to a good school doesn't make you an academic. and I'm not saying Piker didn't benefit from nepotism I literally said he wouldn't be famous if it wasn't for his uncle and his good looks lmao, but this whole piece is just "I hate this nominally leftish rich guy so let me use my new college classes to justify it". I think he sucks too but I don't need to bring up Singer or Maslow to justify it
I don't think "having a college degree" = "being an academic".
Like, I always thought being an academic meant your job was in academia. Teaching in college/university, doing research at those places, writing grant proposals for academic research purposes.
He doesn't just "have a bachelor's". He graduated cum laude with a double major from an elite university, Rutgers. Maybe to you that's not an academic, but it sure looks like it to the rest of us. He also benefited from nepotism, which our elites also consider a sacred institution.
"Being an academic" requires you to have a doctorate or at least be teaching on your way to a doctorate. Quite literally having a doctorate means that you are qualified to teach your subject within academia, thus rendering you an academic. Mind, this is not academic shit, this is pedantic nerd shit.
I'm not a huge fan of either academics or Hasan, but him not calling himself an academic despite having gone to an elite institution is absolutely the correct take. Which is the problem with Hasan, where most of his takes are good despite his nepotism, overwhelming wealth and completely useless job.
If the choice for 'Marxism' is between Hasan and whatever person wrote this essay, I'm sorry but I am choosing Hasan because at least Hasan isn't doing stupid misrepresentation of arguments (most of the time, his clip on TJ was pretty cringe). Fortunately, this isn't some sort of binary and there can be nuance where both of Hasan and articles ranting about Hasan are cringe.
That’s just straight up not what “being an academic” means tho.
“Academic” is an occupation. It usually requires a certain level of education (usually a doctorate or being in the process of getting a doctorate) but primarily it’s a job description for people who get paid to teach at Universities (or other academic institutions) and publish papers in academic journals.
I'm sure that's what it looks like from up in the clouds.
Yeah man, learning basic definitions and stuff is only for the academic elites. We proles only know how to place square peg in round hole.
You forgot eat hot chip and lie.
Yeah! You go! Speak truth to the powerless!
Oh, is that what is happening here? Go complain to a homeless person about how Hasan is an elite academic and not a real anti-capitalist, I'm really sure they will care.
:PIGPOOPBALLS:
Ok credit where credit is due this reply is hilarious
The distinction between a college professor and someone who got good grades in college is not a fine one.
ok now I can't tell if you posted this to dunk on the writer or Piker lol. but I'll assume you're trying to dunk on Piker. graduated cum laude (on financial aid because I'm poor) and I was not a good student, all you need to do is get a B average, it's not some special thing. to me that just sounds like he had enough money to go to a good school. I used to work with a total dip shit who went to Columbia just because his dad is some pharmaceutical executive and could afford it. just having rich parents and going to a good school doesn't make you an academic. and I'm not saying Piker didn't benefit from nepotism I literally said he wouldn't be famous if it wasn't for his uncle and his good looks lmao, but this whole piece is just "I hate this nominally leftish rich guy so let me use my new college classes to justify it". I think he sucks too but I don't need to bring up Singer or Maslow to justify it
deleted by creator
I don't think "having a college degree" = "being an academic".
Like, I always thought being an academic meant your job was in academia. Teaching in college/university, doing research at those places, writing grant proposals for academic research purposes.
That’s not what an academic is
Rutgers is not an elite university, I'm sorry. It's a good one, for sure, but come on. It's a state affiliated university in New Jersey
I was going to tell you to define this term but I can see you're already banned, lol
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Getting good grades does not make you more of an academic