Permanently Deleted

  • Egon
    hexagon
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • aport@programming.dev
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is this a Chamberlain impression? You think Russia is going to stop? Putin is an imperialist megalomaniac who wants fealty and submission.

      If Ukraine signs on the dotted line, Putin will take it as explicit approval of his imperialist expansion on behalf of the entire West. There might be months to a year of tenuous peace then he'll march onward until his puppet is sitting in Kyiv and Ukranians are speaking Russian.

      • Egon
        hexagon
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • Vncredleader
          ·
          1 year ago

          It's funny how appeasement is the word liberals drool over. It is their ONLY historical anecdote and used to defend opposing any movement towards peace, ag Korea. The reality is Chamberlain's big crime was no the act of appeasement, it was knowingly stringing along the French and Soviets only to bail officially when there was no means of changing plans for the USSR and Czechoslovakia.

          Beyond that the comparison also doesn't work because peace talks had occurred multiple times without excluding relevant parties. Minsk was a thing that happened.

          • Egon
            hexagon
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            deleted by creator

          • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            It's just really useful. We want to do something. Remember the time we didn't do something?

        • lesseva96@lemm.ee
          ·
          1 year ago

          You are still operating on the assumption that Russia can somehow win this war? Despite its best soldiers and equipment already being spent while the Ukies bathe in the latest NATO gear? Sure, they may be having trouble with their counteroffensive, but that don't mean that the Russians can mount one of their own. The best case scenario for Russia is a ceasefire and a North/South Korea situation, with a backwards, authoritarian North (Russia) and a prosperous, democratic South (Ukraine).

          • Vncredleader
            ·
            1 year ago

            Democracy is when you have streets named after literal fascists leading to the sites of the Holocaust.

            Also that equipment is not winning Ukraine any territory back. That's like saying the Soviets couldn't win WW2 in late 1944 because Germany was developing a jet fighter at that time.

          • Egon
            hexagon
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            deleted by creator

          • SeventyTwoTrillion [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You are still operating on the assumption that Russia can somehow win this war?

            Yeah, it's so stupid to believe this, I mean, look at who's doing all the conscriptions. Oh. Fuck. Uh, okay, look who has doesn't have a functional air force and is chronically short on ammunition, as admitted by the actual president of the actual United States (who, I hope you agree, is not a puppet of Putin). Hm. Well, look at all the territory that Russia still has in Ukraine! They must be just down a few villages by now considering that Russia is completely out of missiles, is fighting with shovels, is out of artillery, has no ammo, their soldiers are completely demoralized and also all dead! Fuck. Shit.

            Look, if Russia's army is so awful, so utterly and completely imcompetent, so out of ammunition, so demoralized, and Ukraine still can't make a sizable dent in their defences after two months, then holy shit, Ukraine's army must be fucking terrible. Like, holy shit it must be bad.

            • JuneFall [none/use name]
              ·
              1 year ago

              The people having lost are the people being dead, the families separated and people traumatized. Like in all wars. The victims are mostly the working class.

              That said, there are plenty of ways to spin winning and losing for both Ukraine and Russia. Of course for NATO this war war somewhat good, but there can be a couple of things be found that are bad, will not focus on that though.

              Having secured the Krim, having secured a Krim land bridge, having ensured a close alignment of Donbas and Luhansk, having secured control over the Sea of Azov and in addition relevant parts of the North Western section of the Black Sea (and with that ensured access to gas and other resources while denying it to Ukraine), having the river as border in the South between the occupied territories and Ukraine, with mined and defended territory near Donetsk Oblast reduced the open flank of Russia (and its Krim) somewhat. This means millions of people who are effectively living on territory controlled by Russia. This also means a propaganda victory for Putin and thus support from some circles of nationalist society in Russia (for which the education in military basics adds something, too).

              Hard to call all those things failures. That said during a war of attrition and position war is slow till it isn't anymore. I am not on the side of Russia, but I can see how stuff could be spun.

          • Gelamzer
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

      • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        It's honestly really insulting how you just completely ignore entire paragraphs someone spent time writing for you after saying you were interested and willing to learn.

        • Egon
          hexagon
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          deleted by creator

      • uralsolo
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • lesseva96@lemm.ee
          ·
          1 year ago

          Damn this is like, triple-distilled Kremlin Copium Reserve right here. Putin is an entirely rational actor? Lmfao! Is that why he picked a fight with a country a quarter the size of his and got a black eye? Is that why he flip-flopped in the Budapest memorandum? Is that why he blew up Priggy and pals for everyone to see?

          Also, what kinda American provocations are you talking about? Was it the billions in IMF money Russia got in the 90s? That was provocative for sure. Or is it when they sent a spy to infiltrate your ruling party? Oh wait, Butina was Russian, it was the other way around, nevermind.

          • uralsolo
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

        • aport@programming.dev
          ·
          1 year ago

          Remind me, where were Russian forces marching in February last year? It was some city... A capital even. Started with a K.

          • uralsolo
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

              • Adkml [he/him]
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yea it's deffinitly that and not the fact they had taken the territory they stated from the start they were trying to take.

                • Catradora_Stalinism [she/her, comrade/them]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  also didn't it come out later that african states had gotten russia and ukraine to get peace agreements in place so russia withdrew to the single eastern front?

                • aport@programming.dev
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes the stunning military victory knows as "retreat from Kyiv"

                  As you say this I imagine you standing on an aircraft carrier with a big banner behind reading "mission accomplished"

                  • Adkml [he/him]
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    That's fucking hilarious because Kyiv not falling in a week has been touted as a Ukrainian victory even though it was them who set that goal and them literally declaring victory while the russians actually accomplished all their stated goals.

                    Since your such a military genius it's weird how the concept of cutting supply lines to the territories you're trying to take is an unfamiliar concept. Obviously they weren't trying to stop supplies to the actual contested regions they were just yoloing a mission to a capital they never claimed as a goal for no apparent reason.

                      • Adkml [he/him]
                        ·
                        1 year ago

                        Russia: currently holding all the territory they said they wanted to take before the invasion and for the last decade

                        Ukraine: conscripting people to throw at russian defenses resulting in tens of thousands of deaths and retaking zero ground, complaining that the counter offensive is failing because Russia is cheating by using anti tank mines to stop tanks

                        If this is copium it's some good shit

                      • Egon
                        hexagon
                        ·
                        edit-2
                        3 months ago

                        deleted by creator

      • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Schroedinger's Russia: simultaneously on the brink of defeat and collapse, but also this close to taking over all of Europe if we dont send $80 billion more dollars to some nazis right now.