There were two “Reigns of Terror,” if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the one lasted mere months, the other had lasted a thousand years; the one inflicted death upon ten thousand persons, the other upon a hundred millions; but our shudders are all for the “horrors” of the minor Terror, the momentary Terror, so to speak; whereas, what is the horror of swift death by the axe, compared with lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty, and heart-break? What is swift death by lightning compared with death by slow fire at the stake? A city cemetery could contain the coffins filled by that brief Terror which we have all been so diligently taught to shiver at and mourn over; but all France could hardly contain the coffins filled by that older and real Terror—that unspeakably bitter and awful Terror which none of us has been taught to see in its vastness or pity as it deserves.


If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.


Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.

Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.


The Country of the Week is Palestine! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.


Here is the map of the Ukraine conflict, courtesy of Wikipedia.

The weekly update is here.

Links and Stuff

The bulletins site is down.

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists

Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Add to the above list if you can.


Resources For Understanding The War


Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.

Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.

Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.

Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.

On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.


Telegram Channels

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

Pro-Russian

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.

https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.

https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.

https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.

https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.

https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.

https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.

https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine

Almost every Western media outlet.

https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.

https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


Last week's discussion post.


  • Awoo [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Content warning: Death, shooting, bodies. Graphic.

    https://streamable.com/o9ciwm (give it a minute or 2 to process)

    Hard to justify not sharing this one despite how graphic it is as it has some of the most incredible combat footage I have ever seen. Close combat storming of an Israeli base. Showing every single step of the process they undertook from rocket barrages, taking out observation cameras, engineers blowing walls and fences, battles with pillboxes, coordinated drone strikes alongside simultaneous infantry assault.

    Really shows off an extremely professional force.

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        11 months ago

        Islamic religious movements very strongly understand the importance of social media and propaganda and they've gotten very good at it over theyears.

      • Dessa [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Funny, these cameras don't seem to deactivate themselves whenever someting violent is about to happen

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      CW For the video: Close up footage of dead soldiers, blood. Some footage of Hamas soldiers standing victorious over dead IDF soldiers but no desecration that I could see. Please exercise caution and consideration for yourself when deciding whether or not to view the footage.

      Keep in mind that this is propaganda and normal media literacy should be applied.

      Also; The soldiers near the ambulance appear to be armed and, as a result, are legitimate military targets even if they happen to be medics.

      This is gruesome, but the value to morale, and as a propaganda tool, is immense. It shows the Israelis can be defeated in conventional military operations. Whatever happens next the illusion of invulnerability is broken. Even if this offensive fails, even if the Palestinians are wiped out to the last person, this deed cannot be undone and will provide inspiration for resistance fighters throughout history.

    • TreadOnMe [none/use name]
      ·
      11 months ago

      Christ, these IOF guys were completely unprepared. If they aren't the ones attacking unarmed civilians, they have zero idea how to defend themselves. This is pretty typical of what I see of non-special forces soldiers (who are just the craziest genocidal motherfuckers), they have absolutely zero idea how to defend themselves in the event of an actual attack. Imagine not checking for drones above you in the event that you are being attacked by Hamas, having millions of dollars of equipment just sitting there and then just sitting in the bunker waiting to get blown up by grenades.

      We'll see what happens when the shoe is on the other foot for the Palestinians, hopefully they have a good plan for defense, but these guys clearly aren't unarmed children protesting at a fence. Hope a couple snipers got domed here.

      • Awoo [she/her]
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think they were very easily suppressed and then the attackers simply ran up on them and tossed nades in. Either that or they were not actually performing their watch role properly and easily run up on before ever firing a shot.

        I think given how infrequent this kind of attack is, how little experience anyone in the IDF actually has and how fucking boring being on one of these bases must be it's quite likely that they were simply completely incompetent and easily rolled over.

        A bunch of conscripts with no experience and a lot of boredom who don't consider themselves to be in the middle of a war vs well trained fighters who have made peace with death before the operation.

        Combine this with very good strategy by the Palestinians, perfect execution of every role, and very good tactics as well. It's actually not that surprising in hindsight when you put it all on paper.

        The biggest thing this does is expose the Israeli army as a paper tiger, blood is in the water and every single faction of the middle east can see that it.

        • TreadOnMe [none/use name]
          ·
          11 months ago

          It's this crazy thing that people seem to believe that just because you are in the military, you think militarily. If anything, it's the opposite, people who don't join the military don't do it because they know how much bullshit it actually is. I can't imagine having to do it mandatorily.

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]
          ·
          11 months ago

          I think they were very easily suppressed and then the attackers simply ran up on them and tossed nades in.

          This is the standard tactic for dealing with pillboxes if you don't have heavy weapons that can engage them directly. A pillbox provides a great deal of protection, but it also has a more or less literal bulls-eye. If you can put accurate fire on the pillbox's firing ports there's relatively little that the people inside can do to retaliate. An important aspect of static defenses is to have multiple positions with over-lapping fields of fire so the pillboxes can support each other to prevent that from happening; If one fortification is suppressed the fortifications on either side can engage the attackers to suppress them in turn.

          • Awoo [she/her]
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Yeah I'm not sure what's going on with the other pillboxes here. Maybe they were hit with RPGs, rocket artillery, mortar, drone dropped bombs, or something. A lot of possibilities really.

            Quite possible that the Palestinians put 5 bullets in there and the conscripts simply shit themselves, hid, and would not peek afterwards. I don't mean that in an insulting way either, a lot of people would do the same without experience.

            • Frank [he/him, he/him]
              ·
              11 months ago

              Word. Combat is terrifying and lots of people freeze. Sometimes in their first firefight, sometimes after they've been soldiers for years. And they might not have any idea what's going on or what they were up against, just a sudden attack on the base that Hamas was not supposed to be capable of.

        • daisy
          ·
          11 months ago

          The biggest thing this does is expose the Israeli army as a paper tiger

          A conventional-weapon paper tiger, certainly. But there's always that ultimate trump card of being a nuclear-armed state. Of course I don't think even the most bloodthirsty of warhawks in Israel's government would consider nuking Gaza, due to the effects of fallout on Israeli-held territory. But the Israeli government is also one of the countries in the world most prone to extreme disproportionate violence. If they found themselves losing badly in a conventional near-peer war with neighbouring governments, I wouldn't be at all surprised to see them use nukes on adversaries' military bases.

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        11 months ago

        As long as snipers have existed it's been fairly standard practice by all soldiers to kill them when they're captured alive. Back in the earliest days of snipers. around the time of the US civil war, common soldiers believed that engaging in pitched battle was ethically legitimate, while sniping, as it deliberately singled out individuals and killed them from a position of safety, was mere murder. This position was the default through WWI and likely applied in most conflicts since.

        Snipers are often reprehensible people, lacking empathy and perfectly calm when committing deliberate, cold blooded murder. This is not universal; Comrade Pavlichenko evinced a strong moral and ethical foundation for her work, and there are many lauded snipers who have been part of resistance movements engaged in asymmetrical warfare.

        • BeamBrain [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Snipers are often reprehensible people, lacking empathy and perfectly calm when committing deliberate, cold blooded murder.

          Now I'm imagining just how fucked up the people who kill via drone while sitting in air-conditioned bunkers in another time zone must be.

          • Frank [he/him, he/him]
            ·
            11 months ago

            Oh yeah. A lot of them are fully aware that they're monsters. During the GWOT there were a lot of articles talking about how psychologically damaging drone operations are to the operators. Unlike conventional air strikes where the pilot just drops the bombs without seeing the victims drone operators often have kill lists, pictures, and then they watch the victims die on high-resolution cameras. Apparently the attrition rate due to psych casualties is impressive. No matter how much propaganda you pump in to them most humans are not well suited to being monsters.

            Being a sniper is an incredibly demanding job. You need to be able to sit still and alert for hours at a time. You need to be able to do ballistics calculations, like trig, on the fly. You need both patience and attention to detail; Most of what snipers really do is observation and recon, rather than actually shooting people. You need to be very good with your weapons. Proper snipers use very carefully made rifles, optics, and ammunition specific to their role and goals. And it's very physically demanding; Lying in a ditch or in a shallow trench for hours or days observing the enemy or waiting for a clean shot. You have to have a lot of specific qualities to get through sniper school, on top of an attitude that let's you look a person in the eye then kill them from hundreds of meters away.

            Afaik drone operators don't get any of that. They're trained, sure, but not to anything like the same level, or with the same selectiveness.

      • Awoo [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I don't like most of it but this one is particularly well produced to the point of almost being the same quality as airsoft POV content. I think the thing I like the most about this video though is that it combines everything together so you can understand both the strategic and the tactical layer. It's something that can be directly learned from.

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        11 months ago

        Free speech, unless it undermines the propaganda efforts of the Empire.

        Did Facebook ever ban combat footage of Russians being killed?

      • Awoo [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Not even that. I think they're better than CAS has been in the past. A unit that can bring a drone operator with them to perform a precision strike like this while overseeing squad operations is incredibly valuable.

        Imagine this drone operator with a POV headset on, travelling with the squad itself, able to accurately and in realtime relay enemy personnel positions and in this case drop a bomb on them.

        That information and communication vs an enemy that does not have a drone in the air is an absolutely massive force multiplier. You need to be in a dug in and completely sheltered position to be outside of view of drone operators to secure a static position against this. If I was considering base design in modern warfare it would be 100% covered over. No open air at all. Digging underground like the Russian and Ukrainian trench positions is preferable.

        If you also consider that a control room might also have the POV cameras of soldiers in the squad. You could accurately communicate in realtime the locations of enemy personnel to the EXACT squad member that needs that information "Around the corner to your right, directly in front of you." is huge information to have over the other side on a split second basis.

        Large bases like this are going to have a massive problem with drones like these. As soon as the perimeter is breached the attackers have an overwhelming advantage even if the garrison is much larger if they have a drone overhead.

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I've done this in ARMA for years. Obviously not real life, it's a video game, but as a game it's as close to a military infantry simulator as you can get. My group would routinely have one person carrying a quadcopter with thermal optics to use to locate enemy troops, direct fire from indirect fire weapons, and generally keep an eye on things. It was, as you said, a massive advantage. One of the worst parts of close range infantry combat is not knowing where the fuck the enemy is - In camo everyone looks like a bush, and it's very difficult to locate gunfire in a firefight. A drone with thermal optics cut right through a lot of that.

          From what I understand the last 10 years have seen a lot of development in uniforms and equipment that are less visible in IR and thermal for precisely this reason, as with the advent of cheap, reliable thermal optics conventional camo is much less useful.

          Apparently there's a lot of development of anti-drone weapons going on right now. Basically robot turrets with a radar and machine gun, often mounted on a small truck or robot vehicle. It hasn't happened yet, but we're very close to cheap, networked swarm drones that will be able to fly a foot off the ground at 30-40mph, select targets semi-autonomously, and be on ground troops far too fast for them to have any chance of shooting the drones down. They'll be carrying a small fragmenting explosive and will be devastating. Without some kind of robot weapon system that can rapidly and automatically locate and kill drones infantry will be mostly helpless to defeat them.

          There are also apparently loitering drone vehicles that act as a cutting edge modern land-mine. The vehicle can lie dormant, with minimal systems running powered by a solar cell, until it receives an activation command of some kind. At that point it pops up, finds a target (presumably a tank of some kind) and fires it's weapon. You can place them weeks or months in advance of usage and have them ready to go when you send the command, or when an on-board sensor detects a certain programmed condition.

          Frankly it's horrifying. A flying, semi-autonomous grenade is a huge escalation in anti-personnel weaponry; You get most of the advantage of air-strikes with far less collateral, far less cost, and you can presumably issue them to individual infantrymen, or mount a bunch of htem on a truck or APC, and deploy them as needed without waiting for a fire-support mission to come on-station.

      • Outdoor_Catgirl [she/her, they/them]
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, one guy with a quadcopter with bombs to drop is basically a mortar crew with better aim and a whole lot extra situational awareness.

    • diegeticscream[all]🔻@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I think there's a good chance this is stitched together from multiple assaults. Most of the combat footage I've seen on telegram is included here - not sure if that means that there's limited footage, or they're making sure to release it intentionally.

      Definitely a professional assault here.

      Edit: I think I'm wrong, I couldn't find what I was referring to

      • Awoo [she/her]
        ·
        11 months ago

        Hmm odd, most of this was completely new to me, where had you seen the combat sections previously? The combat sections all look like they're the same to me, the parts from Gaza with rocket fire could very much be separate because they don't really need to be contiguous they just need to tell the story that some rocket and mortar fire occurred at that part of the operation.