Image: the last sight of many a commie.


Please pronounce his name wrong to make the title pun work better.

Anyway - Javier Milei, a caricature of a libertarian invented deep in the Hexbear Bit Factory, has won the Argentinian general election; and with a 12 point lead over Massa, it wasn't even particularly close. There are several analogies for this situation - Trump beating Hillary, Bolsonaro winning in 2018, or the alternate universe where Le Pen beat Macron. Massa is not a great guy. The last couple years have been difficult for Argentina, facing massive inflation and the same general economic downturns that are happening everywhere.

Milei is an... interesting person. To name just a couple things going on in his deeply bizarre life, he has a very special relationship with his sister, and an even more special relationship with his mastiff, Conan. When Conan died in 2017, he was so utterly distraught that he had him cloned into four new dogs, named Murray, Milton, Robert, and Lucas, for his economist idols. And he uses mediums to speak to his dead dog. This is probably the closest we're ever going to get to having a dog be president of a country.

Milei wants to essentially collapse the economy even harder. Playing off the general public sentiment of "dollar = good, peso = bad", he has vowed to make the national currency of Argentina the US dollar, thus eagerly giving a massive amount of control over the Argentinian economy directly to America. He wants to take a chainsaw to the status quo, cut off trade with communist countries like China, and demolish the Central Bank. Will Argentinian capitalists and the Senate let him do this? Probably not. What happens with their membership in BRICS+? Who knows. Where does Peronism go from here? Who can say.

But he still won, and will now be president. I suppose that every dog has its day.


Friendly reminder: when commenting about a news event, especially something that just happened, please provide a source of some kind. While ideally this would be on nitter or archived, any source is preferable to none at all given.

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.


Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA daily-ish reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.


The Country of the Week is Argentina! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.

This week's update is here!

Your Thursday Briefing.

Your Friday Briefing.

Your Saturday Briefing.

Here is the map of the Ukraine conflict, courtesy of Wikipedia.

Links and Stuff

The bulletins site is down.

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists

Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Add to the above list if you can.


Resources For Understanding The War


Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.

Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.

Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.

Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.

On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.


Telegram Channels

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

Pro-Russian

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.

https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.

https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.

https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.

https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.

https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.

https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.

https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine

Almost every Western media outlet.

https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.

https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


Last week's discussion post.


  • Evilphd666 [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honest Q - if Argentina wants to piggyback amerikkka currency, what do they think of our reckless endless warmongering and 30+ Trillion in debt? Have they not paid attention to the cost of living in the US or do they think we're all like Dynasty and the Beverly Hillbillies?

    Like what do they think is the .appeal of an increasingly worthless currency of a failing empire? Do they think we'll bail them out? Have they seen Puerto Rico?

    • the_kid
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      what inflation is like 140% and 40% of people are in poverty, they just want economic stability - they want to try something new. and people know that USD is a very stable currency. so they think it'd be a good thing to use USD as a currency. I don't think there's much more thought going into it, and you can't really blame them.

      • RNAi [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yea, this.

        If they weren't US-paid terrorists they would at least advocate for the stupid gold standard. But that's not destructive enough.

    • CarmineCatboy [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      what do they think

      Just to be clear there are two important points to be made here.

      One the ancaps will, in the same breath, claim that central banking is a scam, and then advocate for adopting the currency of a foreign central bank. This hardcore group of support is neither rational nor internally consistent.

      Second is that Argentina has been spiraling for the last 20 years, the last few in particular. Argentineans broadly don't even agree with Millei's policies. This election was more of a protest vote against incumbency than anything. I mean incumbency in the sense that it's extremely difficult to defend whoever is in charge of the country at a given moment. That's how unstable it is.

    • RNAi [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mate, the goal is to kill any sovereignty and safety net or the capability of developing a safety net for workers. That's it. That's the gusanos ultimate goal. And Macri had already did a tremendous job at it.

    • GaveUp [she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Btw American debt isn't a threat at all because it's in their own dollars + USD hegemony

      Just fear mongering because Japan and especially China buys a shit ton of it (which is actually really good for the US)

      • FloridaBoi [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        I said on this reddit-logo one time and one response was “but have you thought of the bondholders?”

    • Kaplya
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      America’s national debt is not the problem (that just means how much the government has spent and not collected back in taxes yet), the problem is that wealth is concentrated in the hands of the 1%. The problem with America is private debt owed to private creditors, which the US government refuses to and will never write down (because they don’t want to hurt the feelings of the private creditors).

      Dollar is not going to become worthless. The dollar is not going to collapse. It will continue to be the reserve currency for a very long time to come. I sincerely hope that people don’t buy into the myth spread by goldbugs and Bitcoiners, many of whom believe that the dollar is going to collapse.

      Michael Hudson explains the real trouble with adopting the dollar in Argentina:

      William asks, I live in Ecuador, which uses the dollar, the US dollar. What are the pros and cons of changing back to its own currency? The sucre, I hope I’m pronouncing that right. Also, Argentina has several exchange rates for its peso: the official rate, a parallel unofficial rate, a rate for the agriculture sector for soya exports.

      Some want Argentina to get rid of the peso and use only the dollar as in Ecuador. Is that a good idea?

      Hudson: That’s a destructive idea. Argentina used to use the dollar. What that means is that for every dollar of its currency, Argentina has to obtain these dollars.

      How does it obtain these dollars that it’s going to use as its currency? Either it exports more grain or beef, or it sells off its public domain. It sells off its land, it sells off its public utilities to get the dollars.

      Using the dollar, or any foreign currency, means that it has to essentially give exports and sell its economy for nothing, just to use the foreign dollars that it could use itself. Same thing with Ecuador. Ecuador did have a left-wing president but you had him replaced by a right-wing person that said all of Ecuador’s export proceeds have to be turned over to the US Treasury for its international spending, mainly on war. Ecuador is going to give its entire economic surplus to finance America’s Cold War.

      Argentina, the right wing there says, let’s use our surplus to finance the Cold War. Let’s not create our own economy. We have to create, we have to maintain austerity here if we really want to crush the working class and the agricultural class and prevent the economy from getting rich, so that we can lord it over the rest of the economy.

      That was discussed way back in their failed dollarization policy of the 1990s. And it’s the same thing. No country should borrow in another country’s currency as Argentina and Ecuador did. They can’t simply create their own credit.

      If you use dollars, then the government can’t do what we were just talking about. If you use dollars as your currency, you can’t just print them to spend, because you can’t create dollars. Only the United States can create dollars. And if you use your own currency, pesos or whatever, then of you can create as many as you want, which is the way things should be.

      So using the dollar is giving up national sovereignty. And one of the classic definitions of a state is: a state has the power to create its own money. Giving up that power means that Argentina and Ecuador are not states. They’re colonies. Financial colonies and monetary colonies of the United States, not independent states.